Laserfiche WebLink
fr <br />�®� Quality C"ntrol Jnspwhon <br />Client: Wright Environmental Services, Inc. <br />QCI#: 1-98-310A <br />Project: E -Z Gas Station Mini Mart - 1405 S. Main Street - Escalon, CA <br />Page: 2 <br />. <br />SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTS <br />I. Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Determinations <br />Test Method: ASTM D1557 -A <br />MAXIMUM <br />OPTIMUM <br />DATE SAMPLED & DRY DENSITY <br />MOISTURE <br />MATERIAL MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION <br />LBS FT <br />PERCENT <br />1 Silty Sand/Hardpan (09/02/98) S. Main St - Stockpile <br />125.3 <br />10.6 <br />It. Field Density Test Results: <br />DEPTH <br />FIELD <br />SPECIFIED <br />BELOW FIELD <br />RELATIVE <br />RELATIVE <br />FINISHED MOISTURE FIELD DRY <br />DENSITY <br />DENSITY <br />"LEST APPROSIMATE GRADE MATERIAL PERCENT DENSITY <br />COMPACTION <br />COMPACTION <br />NO TEST LOCATION INCHES NO DRY WT LBS, FT <br />°ro OF MAX <br />Oro OF MA\ <br />Tests taken in the Pit Backfill Areas <br />Date tested: 09/09/98 <br />Waste Oil Pit Area <br />1 West End of the Pit Area 0 - 12" 1 8.4 112.9 <br />90.1 <br />90 <br />2 Center Section of the Pit 0 - 12" 1 7.6 113.3 <br />90.4 <br />90 <br />3 East End of the Pit Area 0 - 12" 1 4.5 116.6 <br />93.1 <br />90 <br />South Hydraulic Hoist Pit <br />4 East End of the Pit Area 12 - 24" 1 8.0 112.7 <br />90.0 <br />90 <br />5 Center Section of the Pit 12 - 24" 1 7.7 113.3 <br />90.4 <br />90 <br />6 West End of the Pit Area 12 - 24" 1 7.4 113.5 <br />90.6 <br />90 <br />Gas Pit Area <br />7 South End of the Pit Area 36 - 48" 1 7.9 121.6 <br />97.0 <br />85 <br />8 North End of the Pit Area 36 - 48" 1 9.1 120.4 <br />96.1 <br />85 <br />9 East End of the Pit Area 36 - 48" 1 8.7 118.9 <br />94.9 <br />85 <br />Diesel Pit Area <br />10 North End of the Pit Area 60 - 72" 1 7.6 108.2 <br />86.4 <br />85 <br />11 Center Section of the Pit 48 - 60" 1 7.9 106.8 <br />85.0 <br />85 <br />12 South End of the Pit Area 36 - 48" 1 9.0 109.2 <br />87.2 <br />85 <br />The site preparation, fill placement and compacting operations were completed by the time our field personnel were <br />called to the projectsite. In absence ofcontinuous observations by our personnel at the .rite, <br />this report does not express <br />an opinion as to the adequacv of the site preparation, or the uniformity offill placement <br />and compaction nor on the <br />adequacy of the fill to perforin its intended function. <br />We have employed acceptable engineering and testing procedures. We do not however, <br />undertake the guaranree of' <br />construction nor do we relieve the contractor ofhis primary responsibility to produce a completed project conbrining <br />to the project plans, specifications and applicable building codes. <br />fr <br />�®� Quality C"ntrol Jnspwhon <br />