Laserfiche WebLink
D <br /> Doug Wilson JUL 1 0 1992 <br /> Public Health Service <br /> July 10 , 1992 <br /> Page Two ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> first, without a permit . He tested without any employee from <br /> the Health Department being on site to monitor the testing. <br /> He did not supply any copy of the test results to the County. <br /> he did not do the testing in accordance with accepted stand- <br /> ards . He is in fact operating there without a permit . All <br /> this and he takes the position that he voluntarily undertook <br /> the testing to be a good citizen. The fact of the matter is <br /> that he did no testing at all until October 4 , 1991. He did <br /> that only to attempt to find evidence that might assist him <br /> in undoing his contract with me. <br /> 3 ) Vintage has failed to have any pressure test or <br /> precision testing of the tanks made at Pacific Avenue since <br /> he took over August 15 , 1990 . He has failed to have the gas <br /> lines tested there. Further, he has not provided the Health <br /> Department with any of the required quarterlies for the inven- <br /> tory supply method, nor with any of the annuals required <br /> after the new law went into effect. <br /> 4 ) Mr. Giambanco is pleading poverty but he has not <br /> made a payment of any of the sums due to me since June 1991. <br /> He further owns real estate in Stanislaus County as well as <br /> other counties and he represents himself, when convenient , <br /> to be a person of substantial means . I would certainly like <br /> to see him present a financial statement under penalty of <br /> perjury to the County, if his finances are any kind of con- <br /> sideration as to what it will do . Further, at page 48 , line <br /> 11, of his deposition, given under oath, he stated that he <br /> has doubled at Pacific the number of cars that I used to wash <br /> there. <br /> 5 ) With respect to the allegation that I have been un- <br /> cooperative, that is nonsense. I have refused to provide <br /> funds to assist Mr. Giambanco to clean up a contaminated <br /> station that I believe he deliberately caused to be contam- <br /> inated in order to attempt to avoid his contractural obli- <br /> gations with me because he failed to make a go of the business <br /> that he purchased through mismanagement , and in part perhaps <br /> because of economic conditions . <br /> 6 ) Mr. Giambanco ' s statements that he and I discussed <br /> the possibility of electrolysis with respect to the two <br /> sites and that "this contamination problem has been there <br /> for years : any such discussions are a figment of his imagin- <br /> ation. It ' s hard to believe that he would purchase the prop- <br /> erty that he allegedly was told had electrolysis problems in <br /> it . <br /> 7 ) Mr. Giambanco states that "we were never able to <br />