My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL_PLAN 1991
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARCH
>
1206
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231175
>
REMOVAL_PLAN 1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 1:21:15 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:43:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL
FileName_PostFix
PLAN 1991
RECORD_ID
PR0231175
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001247
FACILITY_NAME
DP & DK Investments, Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
1206
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MARCH
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95210
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1206 E MARCH LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\M\MARCH\1206\PR0231175\REMOVAL PLAN 1991.PDF
QuestysFileName
REMOVAL PLAN 1991
QuestysRecordDate
11/16/2011 8:00:00 AM
QuestysRecordID
178257
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAOU•COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES/ENVIRONMENTA0L HEALTH DIVISION <br /> I• UGST WORKSHEET FOR SITE CLOSURE EVALUATION AIE <br /> AME OF FACILITY D� WEE PS CODE 7j <br /> DRESS Q �—, {�J / �n <br /> AHKI-0 p <br /> ANK SIZE UEL TYPE <br /> 11. GENERAL SITE HISTORY V <br /> Is permit current? es o ermit 0acility Status Code 9 oc.Soi l/GW C tes o <br /> umber of tanks at facility ge of Tanks(if available) ype of Tank teel FbrgL rgl Duel <br /> III. TANK HISTORY <br /> as Tank tested? es I VIHO ailed precision test as L L11 o If yes, give date(s) 8'/ <br /> Jas a repair made to the tank system? as No f yes, what was repaired? <br /> as repair done under inspection? es qo ere soil samples analyzedT es o TKE PH-G PH-D b/EDB <br /> Type of failure/discharge atastrophic long-term leakage verf ill nknown cher: <br /> IV. REMOVAL HISTORY (ATTACH INSPECTION REPORT FOR SITE DETAILS/COLLECT DATA FOR LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS) <br /> oil Samples Received es o I epth to Ground Water ) of/Year, ; verage Amual Precipitation = 4 0-25 <br /> n-Site Wells) as o umber 8 Type Irr an ub <br /> S Score S Score S core <br /> istance to Wells) from Tenk ft; ft; ft C 10 pts C 9 pts C pts <br /> 0 if 0 if 0 if <br /> R ondition R condition R ondition <br /> V. Site Feature - Leaching Potential Analysis E is met E is met E s met <br /> inimum Depth to groundwater from the Soil Sample (feet)s0 f. >100 1-100 25-50L <br /> Fractures in subsurface (applies to foothills or mountain areas) None Unknown resent <br /> verage Annual Precipitation (inches) xxxxxx <10 9 10-25 xxxxxx 26.401 <br /> an-Made conduits which increase vertical migration <br /> f leachate (i.e., septic systems, water wells, ponds) None Unknown resent <br /> pique site features: Recharge area, coarse soil, nearby wells. At least ore than <br /> xmx None one one <br /> COLUMN TOTALS>»TOTAL POINTS + + <br /> ampte Result: (B T X OR E) RANGE OF TOTAL POINTS 9 pts or more 41 - 48 pts 40 pts or less <br /> B T K E B T K E <br /> =' �✓ + MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE B-T-X-E LEVELS (PPM) 1 50 50 50 .3 .3 1. 1. NAL <br /> Sample Result: ASOLINE 1000 100 10 <br /> u. TAX <br /> IMUM ALLOWABLE TPN LEVELS (PPM) <br /> TPH IESEL 10,000 1000 100 <br /> OOTNOTES: ***If documented soil and/or ground water contamination is present, do not complete the leaching potential <br /> analysis. (i.e., site is currently on UGT Contamination List for soil or ground water.) <br /> ,L1 If depth is > 5 ft, and < 25 ft., score 0 points. If depth <=5 ft., do not use table. <br /> 1 If precipitation is > 40 inches, score 0 points. <br /> L3 Levels for BTKBE are not appticable at a TPH concentration of 10 ppm (gasoline) or 100 ppm (diesel). <br /> VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION .r _ A,. _ rt �- <br /> 1. Are BTX 8 E or TPH Concentrations > Allowable Levels Yes o <br /> 2. Recommend Site Closure IYes o If Yes, Refer to Site Mitigation for Evaluation <br /> VII. REVIEW EVALUATION - TO BE COMPLETED BY A SUPERVISOR/SENIOR <br /> CONCUR WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CLOSURE ES 0 I FERRED TO SITE MITIGATION FOR EVALUATION ES I 0 <br /> ATE REFERRED I ATE CLOSURE LETTER MAILED I <br /> AME OF <br /> _VALUATOR <br /> EH 23 80 (UGTWKSHT)\5/90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.