COMPLIANCE INFO 2003 - 2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN -26-2007 16:07 Service Station Systems 408 938 8988 P.08 9. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT CTIMP TF - MN( - Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Other (Spec) ® Industry Standard Cj Professional Engineer Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Other (Specify) ❑ Vacuum Pg Hydrostatic Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Fill Sump # 87 Fill Sump # 89 Equipment Resolution: Fill Sump # 91 +/- 0.002" Fill Sump # Diesel Sump Diameter. 64" 64" 64" 64" Sump Depth: 48" 48" 48" 48" Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: 17" 15" I S" ] 6" Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: 15" 16" l5" 16" Condition of sump prior to testing: Good Good Good Good Portion of Sump Tested 2" above piping 2" above piping 2" above i in 2" above piping Sump Material: Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes Test Start Time: 8:14 am 8:14 am 8: l4 am 8:32 am Initial Reading (R,): 4.0445 4.6657 3.2586 4.7382 Test End Time: 8:30 am 8:30 am 8:30 am 8:47 am Final Reading RF: 4.0441 4.6652 3.2582 4.7380 Test Duration: 16 min. 16 min. 16 min. 15 min. Change in Reading(RF-Rt): -0.0004 -0.0005 -0.0004 -0.0002 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" +/- 0.002" +/- 0.002" +/-0,00211 Test Result. ® Pass Fail M Pass Fail IR Pass Fail ® Pass Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No N Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA W Yes ❑ No ❑NA ® Yes ❑ No DNA Z Yes ❑ No []NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testin ? yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0®Yes ❑ No ❑NA ® Yes ❑ No ❑NA ® Yes ❑ No LINA Comments — (include information on re airs made prior to restin , and recommended follow-ap for jailed tests) tensor functionality was not confirmed This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scone of work".