Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 Page Z- of <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: ank Manufacturer El Industry Standard El Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Spec) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure Fi Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Sp y�) <br /> Test Equipment Used: sof f a teru�+1911a«dlJ let Wow ' n t(S Equipment Resolution: —t12,-34 AJ j <br /> Tank#i ITaok# Z ,Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑Yes o ❑Yes Oo ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Tank Capacity: lZ O32Ggl/�S l ( 3Z rq /oy <br /> Tank Material: « a e K2e LvJ <br /> Tank Manufacturer: d 2p1-n�O1 iYY L11 (} <br /> Product Stored: n,- L 1)g eS e(_ ty <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> press acu ter and 1 <br /> startin test: 1 �04✓ 1 e)LA ✓ ' <br /> Test Start Time: 2 '- 3 U 12-' 36 <br /> Initial Reading(Ri): — 10 — t d (4 <br /> Test End Time: 1 3 [J t <br /> Final Reading(RF): — ' - <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading(RF-R,): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br /> Test Result: Pass ❑Fail fZ-Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑ all Pass ❑lAeil <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? Yes ❑No ❑NA es ❑No ❑NA ❑ es ❑No A Yes ❑No ❑PiA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? �1 es ❑No ❑NAes ❑No ❑NA Yes ❑No ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA <br /> Comments— (include information on repairs made prior to testing; and recommended ollow up forLailed tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. f California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />