Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB,January 2002 . • Page V- ofc� <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: Tank Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> - ❑Other(Spec) ..® <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure Xvacuum ❑Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test EquipmentUsed:�., ;{-{ .<<k (J � t�arr�N u<., <br /> G _0 ;},t ,. Equipment Resolution: <br /> Tank#- Z L Tank# 2 tTank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑Yes I]No ❑Yes o ❑ Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No/I <br /> Tank Capacity: ?-0!�5 I l0 5 ZION <br /> Tank Material: ( P tiS S� '( 61 eis5 <br /> Tank Manufacturer: /vt Uc%.v o) F 1,, . t-rt ice d G)f f 1c 5 <br /> Product Stored: i2«ut r r i'1t•r Sr,yr/ 0%ese L- <br /> Wait time tweapplymg <br /> pressur vacu ater and <br /> starting ( �1uu I kok <br /> Test Start Time: 10 '. <br /> o U <br /> Initial Reading(Ri): — 10 14 <br /> •-- 1 A A- <br /> Test End Time: l L . y 5 `:• ��O <br /> Final Reading(RF): — t D <br /> Test Duration: 3 I 3 OLA-5 <br /> Change in Reading(RF-R,): 14 <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: v o C o S S - t-)e) toss <br /> Test Result: fF Pass ❑Fail E( Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail Pass ❑r ail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? Yes ❑No ❑NA es ❑No ❑NA ❑Y ❑No ❑N Yes ❑No ' A <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? yes ❑No ❑NA Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ es ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No 0 <br /> Comments-(include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommendedfollow up forfaded tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />