My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2017 - 2018
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
24323
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231947
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2017 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:14 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:49:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2017 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231947
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0004345
FACILITY_NAME
JAHANT FOOD N FUEL STOP
STREET_NUMBER
24323
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00516019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
24323 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\N\HWY 99\24323\PR0231947\COMPLIANCE INFO 2017 - PRESENT .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2017 - PRESENT
QuestysRecordDate
2/13/2017 7:56:57 PM
QuestysRecordID
3337085
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f-ECE `E ® <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing /, 4 <br /> Software Version Installed: 133.02 APR 2 " 2017 <br /> Com fete the followina checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Is the audible alarm operational? il <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Is the visual alarm operational? t <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper <br /> operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.,modem)operational? <br /> ® N/A <br /> ® Yes ® No' For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automabcally shut down h the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br /> ❑ N/A fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes.which sensors inhiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ®Sump/Trench Sensors; <br /> ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e., no mechanical overall prevention valve is <br /> ® N/A installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill pomt(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity <br /> does the alarm bigger? A <br /> ❑ Yes ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name <br /> and model for all replacement pans in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Yes' ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No' Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Cottemsi 89 STP SUMP SENSOR NOT FUNCTIONING REPLACED W/ELITE IV ON SITE- PASS <br /> DIESEL DOES NOT HAVE POSITIVE SHUT DOWN, LINE TEST DONE TODAY <br /> Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.