Laserfiche WebLink
8 2095327320 08,23/02 21 18 P.02 <br /> • <br /> Facility Name: Universal Sweeping Services (Page 2) <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> software Version Installed: 1000_0; Rev 0.08 <br /> Comfete the follow, checklist: <br /> yes ❑ No' is the audible alarm opera <br /> [ionel? <br /> Yes ❑ No Is the visual alarm o rational? <br /> Yes No' Is the rint function o erational? No erational? <br /> ot installed. <br /> Yes [� Nos Were all sensors visual) inspected,functional) tested,and confirmed <br /> ❑Yes <br /> ® No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other oquipment <br /> will not interfere with their to er n eration? <br /> []Yes E] No* If alarms are relayed to a rumme monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> ® N/A operational? <br /> Yes ® No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ <br /> N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconQnecnlisdenlser Containment Sensors!ate <br /> positive shut-dawn'! (Cheek all that apply) ❑ <br /> Sump/Trench Sensors; p <br /> Did on confirm ositive shut-down due to leaks sensor failure(disamnoction7 Yes: <br /> No. <br /> ❑ the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device OX. no <br /> yes ❑ No' For tank systems that utilize <br /> N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill Diol s and o eratin ro ort ? If so,at what ercent of tank ca acit door lite alarm tri er? <br /> E]yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probos, or other equipment <br /> re laced and list the manufacturer name and model for ell replacement arta in Section E.below. <br /> Yes' No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check a!1 that apply) <br /> Product; ❑ Water. if yes,describe causes in Section F, below. <br /> Yes ❑ No' Was monitorin s stem get-it reviewed to ensure ro er SCUM s?Attach se[u re orts if a livable <br /> Yes ❑ No' Is all monitorin a ui ment o eralional er manufacturer's s eciftcations? <br /> • In Section E below,describe how and when these defictencles were ar will he corrected. <br /> E. Comments: liquid Gasoline was found in the gasoline tank annular space. Vacuum testing was performed to dertemlae <br /> if the secondary was sound. The vacuum leaked down over a period of 60 minutes from an initial reading of 15.1"vacuum to <br /> 13.2" vacuum. The initial product level reading in the secondary was 1.25 inches; the final reading was 1.25'. The product <br /> level in the tank was 13" of gasoline. This would he significant in determining whether a leak was above or below the current <br /> level of fuel in the tank. The Gasoline annular sensor had been elevated by wrapping electrical tape around the wire so it <br /> hung above the tank bottom. This prevented the sensor from detecting the product in the annular. <br />