Laserfiche WebLink
S WRCB,January 2002 • • Page Z of <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: ank Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> ❑Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑Pressure Vacuum ❑Hydrostatic <br /> ❑Other(Spec6) <br /> Test Equipment Used: 6-43k acecur t VkGG �c im, 1{ , Equipment Resolution: -( z-3d 1 <br /> Tank# L ank# Tank# Tank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' ❑Yes No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No <br /> Tank Capacity: 600 "Uuv s <br /> Tank Material: 0141 s 1 5+-Qu-t <br /> Tank Manufacturer: f--lock u lcl <br /> Product Stored: <br /> Waittitne e4applying <br /> press a/vacuum/ ,tater and <br /> startin ko L'L <br /> Test Start Time: _ <br /> Initial Reading(Rj): - to " <br /> Test End Time: —2-1- IS <br /> Final Reading(RF): —ILO <br /> Test Duration: ( l'C)to V <br /> Change in Reading(RF-RD: <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: iv 0 Loss ,it. <br /> Test Result: ass ❑Fail 0 ass ❑ ail ❑. ass ❑F ' ass ❑"Fal <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? es ❑No ❑NA ❑ es ❑No ❑ A ❑ es ❑No ❑ es ❑No 11A, <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and es ❑No ❑NA Yes ❑No ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments- (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommendedfollow-up for failed tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />