My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1434
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231465
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2023 10:49:21 AM
Creation date
11/8/2018 10:02:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0231465
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003739
STREET_NUMBER
1434
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95337
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1434 W Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\Y\YOSEMITE\1434\PR0231465\COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003
QuestysRecordDate
6/26/2017 11:25:13 PM
QuestysRecordID
3467494
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of TestinoServicing <br /> software version Installed: <br /> COMPI the following checldisL <br /> !if-Yes 12 No' Is the audible alarm rational? ' <br /> Yes 0 No- Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> Xes Q No= Were all sensors visatally his funcrionaD tes ed and confirmed operational? <br /> Yes Cl No% Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary comainmeni and positioned so that other equipment Will <br /> not interfere With their proper o eratina? <br /> Cl Yes Cl No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring smtion, is all commnnicadons egtupment (c.-I. modem) <br /> UL NIA operational? <br /> {�Yes Cl Nom For press>ri=d piping systems,does the turbine automatically shit down if the piping secondary containment <br /> Cl NIA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically discaunecbed? If ym which sensors imiliate <br /> positive shut-&%T? (Check aid 11n!ePF2y)�y?$ump(Cretrclt Sensors; Cl Disper Containment Sensors. <br /> Did confirm live stint-down due to leaks and sensor fatlureldtscormeation? ❑Yes; Ci No. <br /> 7 Yes Q No* For tank systems that utihm the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> 5F N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alum visible and audible at the taut <br /> fill int(s)and o eratin I ? If so,at What percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ❑ Yes- At No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identity specific sensors,probes,or other equiprnent replaccd <br /> and list the manufacturer mate and model for all replacenient pairs in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* jk No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems o=gned as dry systems? (Check all char apply)Ct <br /> Product; ❑Wait,. 13 ys.desrn iz cauroes in Seetion E,below. <br /> W Yes ❑ No* 0.ras monitoring set- reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> Yes 7 No" Is all r�mm- ui enc eratiooal a manufnert er sspecifications? <br /> °In Section E below,demibe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments- <br /> Page 2 of 3 mlUr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.