My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROADWAY
>
1905
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518600
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:53:10 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518600
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013996
FACILITY_NAME
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1905
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BROADWAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14315004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1905 N BROADWAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORNIA -Environmentr-ction Agency - <br /> NA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD PETE WILSON Govern <br /> AL VALLEY REGION m"> <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A 1 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 H` HE <br /> ;fir'- + 'i Al TI/ p' <br /> PHONE: (916) 255-3000 /?Vlu <br /> FAX: (916) 255-3015 Cr C <br /> Ppb ! 24 <br /> 1 February 1996 <br /> Mr. Nick Nickerson <br /> Unocal Corporation <br /> 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 <br /> San Ramon, CA 94583 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING. PUREGRO/BREA AG, STOCKTON <br /> Thank you for submitting the Fourth Quarter 1995 Quarterly Monitoring Report for the former <br /> PureGro/Brea Ag facility at 1905 N. Broadway, Stockton. I have several comments after reviewing <br /> the report: <br /> - As you know, nitrate may be expressed either as nitrate or as nitrate-nitrogen; there is a <br /> difference of about 4.5 between these two values. The report is rather confusing in that the <br /> summary analytical table lists nitrate-N, while the cover letter and the text refer to nitrate. In <br /> the future, please use one form or the other throughout the entire report. <br /> - The executive summary section implies that the background nitrate concentration in the <br /> groundwater is about 40 mg/1. This is not quite accurate, as nitrate concentrations in MW-3 <br /> and MW-10 have ranged from 24 to 131 mg/l of nitrate (5.3 to 29 mg/l NO3-N). <br /> - Figure 3 contains a statement that MW-8 data was suspect and wasn't used to calculate the <br /> potentiometric surface. The body of the report should contain a discussion about why this data <br /> was suspect and what will be done in the future to obtain correct elevations from MW-8. <br /> I have also reviewed the file recently, and think that it would be appropriate to meet to discuss our <br /> progress. The topics should include the need to define the extent of the plume, the status of the on- <br /> site remediation, the need for a well installation report, and the on-site soil sampling conducted by <br /> Crop Production Service. <br /> Jan Wagoner and I discussed meeting during the week of 12 February; please contact me to confirm <br /> the date and time. I can be reached at (916) 255-3104. <br /> WENDY WYELS <br /> Ag Regulatory Unit <br /> cc: Mr. Jan Wagoner, Unocal, West Sacramento <br /> Mr. John Rapp, Sierra Pacific Groundwater Consultants, El Dorado Hills <br /> Mr. Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County Public Health, Stockton <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.