My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROADWAY
>
1905
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518600
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 10:53:10 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 10:30:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518600
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013996
FACILITY_NAME
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1905
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
BROADWAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14315004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1905 N BROADWAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-rH U 9 : 1 8 <br /> STATE OF CAUFORNIA-Erdeonmental F Ageney • PETE WILSON,G04-mor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL HOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3643%utier Finae. Sulte A <br /> Sacramento,CA 95627-9098 <br /> PHONE: T16)255-3010 <br /> FAY (916)2a5-301 S <br /> 3 March 1993 <br /> Mr. Nick Nickerson <br /> Unocal Assessment and Remediation <br /> 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 <br /> San Ramon, CA 94583 <br /> REYIfW OF WORKPLAN FOR THE PIJREGRO/8REA STOCKTON FACILITY <br /> Thank you for submitting the "Soil and Groundwater Investigation" workplan <br /> prepared by Condor. After reviewing the workplan, I have the following <br /> comments: <br /> Section 3.1 . We feel very strongly that a fourth monitoring well should be <br /> installed near the location of the former 2,2-0 aboveground tank. This fourth <br /> well is needed for two reasons: to assess any impact from the former tank, and <br /> to provide a better measurement of groundwater gradient. The gradient is so <br /> flat in this area that a slight measurement error could significantly impact <br /> the determination of gradient. A fourth well would provide four <br /> triangulations to measure the gradient, allowing for a greater degree of <br /> reliability. <br /> 5ection 3.3. Condor suggests a 20' screen length for the wells, but proposes <br /> to determine the final length while in the fieldAlthough the groundwater <br /> i <br /> has dropped dramatically in the last few years, t is staff's experience that <br /> a screen longer than 20' has the potential to intercept another aquifer or to <br /> dilute the sample beyond what is reasonable. <br /> Section 4.0. The flat groundwater gradient necessitates an extremely accurate <br /> well collar survey. <br /> Section 5.0. As discussed with Condor at an earlier date, samples must be <br /> analyzed for nitrate+nitrite, not Jost nitrate. When acidified with sulfuric <br /> acid, the holding time for nitrate+nitrite in water is 28 days. The holding <br /> time for TKN in water is also 28 days, not 48 hours as shown in Table 1. <br /> Because of the gasoline, diesel , and kerosene found in the soil during the <br /> 1991 excavation work, the Board will also require that the initial groundwater <br /> samples be analyzed for TAH-d and TPH-G (EPA methods 3510 and 5030) . <br /> 5ection 6 0 The groundwater samples collected on a quarterly basis must be <br /> analyzed for 1 ,2-D, nitrate+nitrite, and TKN. THP-4 and/or TPH-G analyses may <br /> also be required if the initial samples are positive for these constituents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.