My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
15971
>
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
>
PR0515798
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 11:37:55 AM
Creation date
1/8/2019 9:26:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2800 - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0515798
PE
2832
FACILITY_ID
FA0009326
FACILITY_NAME
HALEY FLYING SERVICE INC
STREET_NUMBER
15971
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
18912012
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15971 S TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
FRuiz
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This violation will be closed owe PE certified plan is received. <br /> Violation#706-Failed to provide and maintain adequate secondary containment. <br /> If the single walled 1,000 gallons tank does not meet the definition of permanently closed(see violation 301)it needs to be addressed in <br /> the plan,unless it has been removed. <br /> Violation#710-Plan failed to adequately discuss procedures to test or inspect each container for Integrity. <br /> There are some concerns with Section 8 Periodic Integrity Testing Schedule(2009 revision)of the SPCC plan. <br /> • I am not sure that the UL Standards mentioned are inspection standards but instead are construction standards for <br /> aboveground tanks to be able to store certain product. Since this will be certified by a professional engineer this will be <br /> forwarded to the EPA who would have the authority to make a decision on this. <br /> • The regulations state that all tanks must be tested or inspected for integrity on a regular schedule and whenever material <br /> repairs are made.The inspection procedures only focus on Tank#1 and tank#2.The facility has more than 2 tanks at the <br /> facility.What is the integrity inspection/testing procedure for the other APSA regulated tanks?The other tanks would new a <br /> discussion in the environmental equivalence section since it is not clear that they are being inspected or tested for integrity <br /> under any industry standard.This should include per regulations the reasons for nonconformance in your Plan and describe in <br /> detail alternate methods and how you will achieve equivalent environmental protection. <br /> • The regulation states that You must determine,in accordance with industry standards,the appropriate qualifications for <br /> personnel performing tests and inspections,the frequency and type of testing and inspections,which take into account <br /> container size,configuration,and design.The qualifications of the person testing or inspecting the tanks is not described for <br /> any of the tanks. <br /> • One of the sections discussing the inspection of the tanks refers to containers that are subject to 21 CFR part 110.None of the <br /> tanks at the facility would be subject to that regulation and the paragraph would exclude the tanks from being inspected.This <br /> is the Food and Drug Administration Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing or Holding Human Food. <br /> • A comment on the provided statements for return to compliance or for the SPCC plan. Federal SPCC regulations,State APSA <br /> regulations and local County ordinances do not set the inspection or testing schedule for the tanks.This is normally found in <br /> the selected industry standard or is set by the professional engineer,the same applies for the qualifications of the person <br /> inspecting the tanks. <br /> • The reasons why STI-SP001 is not being used should be in the SPCC plan,this would then be certified by the professional <br /> engineer.This would be the response provided for line item#710 part B in the return to compliance certification that was <br /> provided. <br /> Violation#726-Plan failed to adequately describe overfill prevention methods for each container. <br /> The plan states that overfill containment boxes/chambers are available for each AST.And that containers of 55 gallons are exempt?Be <br /> aware that containment boxes do not meet the overfill requirements of APSA/SPCC regulations. <br /> Another part of the plan states that the tanks have a cam locking filling device and fill trucks have automatic shutoffs when desired <br /> volume is reached. <br /> This will be verified during the next inspection.Overfill devices should meet one of the following requirements. <br /> i) High liquid level alarms with an audible or visual signal at a constantly attended operation or surveillance station. In smaller facilities <br /> an audible air vent may suffice. <br /> (ii)High liquid level pump cutoff devices set to stop flow at a predetermined container content level. <br /> (iii)Direct audible or code signal communication between the container gauger and the pumping station. <br /> (iv)A fast response system for determining the liquid level of each bulk storage container such as digital computers,telepulse,or direct <br /> vision gauges.If you use this alternative,a person must be present to monitor gauges and the overall filling of bulk storage containers. <br /> (v)You must regularly test liquid level sensing devices to ensure proper operation. <br /> Violation#4010-Unlisted Administration/Documentation violation. <br /> APPENDIX C TO PART 112--SUBSTANTIAL HARM CRITERIA is not included in the SPCC plan.Appendix C to <br /> Part 112 needs to be filled out and retained at the facility. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.