My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:07:25 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 9:57:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000194
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R10/71-51-1C <br /> While this may not promote the second objective ( i e , construction plans on site), <br /> passive remediation may be difficult to obtain This is due to the fact that this is a "no- <br /> action" alternative Regulatory agencies seldom agree that "no-action" is the appropriate <br /> remedial action Extensive site characterization and demonstration studies may be <br /> required to show that adverse environmental and human impacts will not occur <br /> 7 3 2 Remedial Action Option for Soil <br /> The "No-Acton" option was discussed in detail in section 7 3 1 No source control <br /> options were identified (see Table 14) The other options are described below <br /> 7 3 2 1 In Situ Containmgnt <br /> In situ containment of subsurface wastes or contaminated soils involves theP lacement <br /> of engineered barriers around the wastes to isolate them from groundwater and to <br /> minimize the infiltration of surface water into the waste containment The technology <br /> employed typically involves trenching around a site and into an impermeable subsurface <br /> layer The trench is filled with a grout or slurry for stability during excavation An <br /> impermeable backfill is then planned in the trench, dispersing the slurry and creating the <br /> cut-off wall A synthetic membrane and /or earthern cap is constructed over the site so <br /> that the cap perimeter extends beyond the cut-off wall thereby isolating the waste from <br /> the environment The actual construction is little different in principle from many large <br /> "earthwork" construction projects Caps and cut-off walls provide barriers to movement <br /> of wastes and contaminated groundwater (leacheate) off site, and to movement of <br /> groundwater into the containment Caps also prevent direct exposure to contaminated <br /> soil and prevent airborne contamination Depending on the waste constituents and site <br /> hydrogeological conditions,the subsurface impervious stratum (hydraulic conductivity<10- <br /> 7 cm/second) may be a native clay layer or bedrock The placement of an engineered <br /> bottom barrier may be considered if a natural barrier is not present at reasonable depths <br /> At Shop-10, the area above the locations where underground tanks were removed has <br /> a gravel fill and is very permeable The surrounding areas may however be considered <br /> to adequately capped so long as the asphalt pavement is kept in good repair <br /> 7322 Excavation and Disl2osallTreatment <br /> Excavation, as referred to in this document, is the process by which the affected soils are <br /> 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.