Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> wells (MW-10 through MW-12) and drilled two soil borings (AB-1 and AB-2) in April 1992, and <br /> Environmental Assessors, Inc (EA) installed six monitoring wells (MW-13, MW-14, MW-16, <br /> MW-19, MW-20 and MW-24) and drilled four soil borings (SB-15, SB-17, SB-18 and SB-22) in <br /> October 1993 In September 1995, Geocon installed vapor extraction well VW-I Geocon also <br /> installed two vapor extraction monitoring wells (VM-1 and VM-2), two additional groundwater <br /> monitoring wells (MW-25 and MW-26) and one replacement groundwater monitoring well (MW- <br /> 11) in August 1996 to complete characterization of site conditions <br /> FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> Groundwater Level Measurements and Flow Direction <br /> ' Representatives of Geocon measured the depths to groundwater in twelve groundwater monitoring <br /> wells on October 23, 1996 Depth to groundwater measurements were obtained using a battery <br /> operated water level meter with measurements obtained from the top of each well casing <br /> Groundwater was encountered at depths between 59 and 61 feet below the top of the well casings A <br /> summary of the top of well casing elevations, groundwater level measurements and groundwater <br /> elevations is presented on Table 1 Based on the October 23, 1996 groundwater elevation data, the <br /> groundwater flow is directed to the east at an approximate gradient of 0 002 ft/ft Groundwater <br /> elevation contours and gradient for the October 1996 monitoring event are depicted on the <br /> ' Groundwater Elevation Map, Figure 2 <br /> Well Purging and Sampling <br /> Prior to groundwater collection, approximately three well volumes of groundwater were extracted <br /> from wells MW-9, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, MW-14, MW-16, MW-19, MW-20, MW-24, VW-1, <br /> MW-25 and MW-26 utilizing a 2-inch diameter submersible pump Groundwater extraction was <br /> ' performed to allow fresh formation water to infiltrate the wells During well purging activities the <br /> groundwater was monitored for pH, electrical conductivity and temperature Groundwater recovery <br /> was monitored in order to ensure 80 percent well recovery prior to well sampling Monitoring well <br /> sampling data sheets are presented in Appendix A Purged groundwater was discharged into a water <br /> trailer and DOT 17-H 55-gallon drums pending discharge to the City of Stockton (City) sanitary <br /> sewer system A new wastewater discharge permit for the disposal of purge water to the sanitary <br /> sewer is currently being processed by the City <br /> Following well recovery, a water sample was collected from each well using polyethylene disposable <br /> bailers and decanted into 40-m1 volatile organic analyses vials and one-liter amber bottles The <br /> samples were sealed, labeled and placed in an ice chest containing ice and were transported to <br /> Geocon's Sacramento Office for cold storage at 4 degrees celsius pending shipment to the analytical <br /> laboratory The samples were subsequently transported to Advanced Technology Laboratory (ATL) <br /> using standard cham-of-custody protocol <br /> ANALYTICAL METHODS AND RESULTS <br /> Laboratory Analysis <br /> I <br /> The groundwater samples were delivered to ATL for the analyses of TFHg and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) following EPA Test Method 8015 modified, and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) following EPA Test <br />' Project No 58104-06-62 -2- November 27, 1996 <br />