Laserfiche WebLink
Project No 58100-06-62 <br /> August 22, 1996 <br />' Page 2 <br /> t ]FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> t Groundwater Level Measurements and Flow Direction <br /> A representative of Geocon measured the depths to groundwater in nine groundwater monitoring <br /> wells on July 2, 1996 Debris was noted inside the well casing in MW-1 ], consequently, this well was <br />' dry and omitted from the monitoring event Depth to groundwater measurements were obtained using <br /> a battery operated water level meter with measurements obtained from the top of each well casing <br /> Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 17 96 to 18 30 meters (58 94 to 60 05 feet) <br /> below the top of the well casings A review of groundwater elevations from the previous monitoring <br /> event in April 1996 indicates that the groundwater table has risen approximately 0 34 meters (1 11 <br /> feet) A summary of the top of well casing elevations, groundwater level measurements and <br /> groundwater elevations is presented on Table 1 Based on the July 2, 1996 groundwater elevation <br /> data, the groundwater flow is directed to the east at an approximate gradient of 0 006 ftlfL <br /> 1 Groundwater elevation contours and gradient for the July 1996 monitoring event are depicted on the <br /> Site Plan, Figure 2 <br /> Well Purging and Sampling <br /> Prior to groundwater collection, approximately three well volumes of groundwater were extracted <br /> from wells MW-9, MW-12 through MW-14, MW-16, MW-19, MW-20, MW-24, and VW-1 utilizing <br /> an electric submersible pump Groundwater extraction was performed to allow fresh formation water <br /> to infiltrate the wells During well purging activities the groundwater was monitored for pH, electrical <br /> conductivity and temperature Groundwater recovery was monitored to order to ensure 80 percent <br /> well recovery prior to well sampling Monitoring well sampling data sheets are presented in <br />' Appendix A Purged groundwater was discharged to the sanitary sewer system in accordance with a <br /> City of Stockton industrial waste water discharge authorization <br />' Following well recovery, a water sample was collected from each well using polyethylene disposable <br /> bailers and decanted into 40-m1 volatile organic analyses vials and one liter amber bottles The <br /> samples were sealed, labeled and placed in an ice chest containing ice and were transported to <br /> Geocon's Sacramento Office for cold storage at 4 degrees celsius p ending shipment to the analytical <br /> laboratory The samples were subsequently transported to Advanced Technology Laboratory (ATL) <br /> located to Signal Hill, California, using standard chain-of-custody protocol <br /> ANALYTICAL METHODS AND RESULTS <br />' Laboratory Analysis <br /> The groundwater samples were delivered to ATL for the analyses of TPHg and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) following EPA Test Method 8015 modified, benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) following EPA Test Method 8020 and methyl-tert butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) following EPA Test Method 8020 The laboratory reports and chain of custody <br /> documentation are presented in Appendix B <br />