Laserfiche WebLink
Between March 1992 and January 1996, twelve monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-12) were <br /> installed at the site to evaluate groundwater quality and to attempt to delineate groundwater impacts <br /> In addition, two dual purpose vapor extraction/groundwater monitoring wells (VW-1 and VW-2) <br /> ' were installed in the vicinity of the former USTs in order to facilitate future hydrocarbon source <br /> removal through vapor extraction <br /> Historically,the highest TPHg and benzene concentrations in groundwater have been detected within <br /> ' and in the vicinity of the former UST excavation in wells VW-1 and VW-2 at concentrations of <br /> 54,000 micrograms per liter (µg/1) TPHg and 8,100 µg/l benzene Concentrations of dissolved phase <br /> hydrocarbons in groundwater decrease to below test method detection limits in perimeter wells MW- <br /> ' 9 and MW-10 TPHd has been detected in perimeter well MW-12 TPHg, TPHd, benzene, and <br /> methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) have been detected in the eastern most perimeter well, MW-11, at <br /> maximum concentrations of 600, 120, 5 1 and 170 µg11, respectively <br /> 1 FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> Groundwater Level Measurements and Flow Direction <br /> Representatives of Geocon measured the depths to groundwater in fourteen groundwater monitoring <br /> wells on October 22, 1996 Depth to groundwater measurements were obtained using a battery <br /> operated water level meter with measurements obtained from the top of each well casing <br /> Groundwater was encountered at depths between 59 and 61 feet below the top of the well casings A <br /> ' summary of the top of well casing elevations, groundwater level measurements and groundwater <br /> elevations is presented on Table 1 Based on the October 22, 1996 groundwater elevation data, the <br /> groundwater flow is directed towards the east at an approximate gradient of 0 0008 ft/ft which is <br /> consistent with the previous monitoring events performed in April and July 1996 Groundwater <br /> elevation contours and gradient for the October 1996 monitoring event are depicted on the Site Plan, <br /> ' Figure 2 <br /> Well Purging and Sampling <br /> Well purging and groundwater sample collection was performed on October 22 and 23, 1996 Prior <br /> to groundwater sample collection, approximately three well volumes of groundwater were extracted <br /> from each well utilizing a submersible pump Groundwater extraction was performed to allow fresh <br /> formation water to infiltrate the wells During well purging activities, the groundwater was <br /> monitored for pH, electrical conductivity and temperature Groundwater recovery was monitored in <br /> ' order to ensure 80 percent well recovery prior to well sampling Monitoring well sampling data <br /> sheets are presented in Appendix A Purged groundwater was discharged into a water trailer pending <br /> discharge to the City of Stockton (City) sanitary sewer system A new wastewater discharge permit <br /> ' for the disposal of purge water to the sanitary sewer is currently being processed by the City <br /> Following well recovery, a water sample was collected from each well using polyethylene disposable <br /> bailers and decanted into 40-m1 volatile organic analyses vials and one-Mer amber bottles The <br /> ' samples were sealed, labeled and placed in an ice chest containing ice and were initially transported <br /> to Geocon's Sacramento office for cold storage at 4 degrees Celsius pending shipment to the <br /> analytical laboratory The samples were subsequently shipped to Advanced Technology Laboratories <br /> (ATL), using standard chain-of-custody protocol <br /> Project No S8100-06-62 -2- November 27, 1996 <br /> 1 <br />