Laserfiche WebLink
Cahforma Department of Transportation Revised September 23, 1994 <br /> Project No 102818A-01 <br /> iproduct-sensing interface probe No product was detected The depth to the static water <br /> level was then measured relative to the reference marking on the top of the well casing The <br /> water level measuring instrument was decontaminated after each use by washing the probe <br /> and lead line with a solution of potable water and tnsodium phosphate, followed by a <br /> potable water rinse and a deionized water rinse. Groundwater at the site is present at an <br /> a ate depth of 65 feet below ground surface (b s) and flows to the north at an <br /> approximate gradient of 0 0013 feet per foot The groundwater elevation measurements are <br /> summarized in Table 1. A groundwater gradient map is presented as Figure 3 <br /> The three groundwater wells,designated MW-A(MW-1),MW-B(MW-2),and MW-C(MW-3), <br /> were also sampled On June 1, 1994,_the wells were purged using a 2-inch diameter <br /> submersible pump The submersible pump and associated hoses were decontaminated after <br /> each use with a solution of potable water and tnsodium phosphate, followed by a potable <br /> water rinse and a deionized water rinse The interior and exterior of the pump and hoses <br /> were washed by submersing the equipment in the solutions and drawing wash and rinse <br /> water through the pump system A minimum of three casing volumes were purged from <br /> each of the monitoring wells prior to collection of a water sample Temperature, pH, and <br /> specific conductance measurements were made in the field for the purpose of establishing <br /> when a representative groundwater sample could be taken Purging continued in each well <br /> until pH, temperature, and conductivity did not vary by more than 10 percent The_ <br /> morutonna well purge water was placed in labelled 55-gallon,DOT-approved drums and left <br /> on site in the-stp-wardship of Caltrans Field measurements and general observations for <br /> each well were recorded on the well sampling records presented in Appendix A <br /> After purging, the water in each well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its <br /> original elevation Water samples were then collected using a disposable, Teflon, bottom- <br /> discharging bailer, transferred to an appropriate sample container, labelled, and placed in a <br />' cooler containing ice at 4 degrees Celsius under chain-of-custody protocol Water samples <br /> were collected on June 1, 1994 Samples were secured in a cooler containing ice at 4 degrees <br /> rCelsius and transferred by truck to San Diego on June 3, 1994, and then temporarily stored <br /> • in refrigeration at the San Diego office of Ninyo &Moore Samples were then delivered to <br />