Laserfiche WebLink
California Department of Transportation July 7, 1994 <br /> Project No 102818A-01 <br /> level was then measured relative to the reference marking on the top of the well casing The <br /> water level measuring instrument was decontaminated after each use by washing the probe <br /> and lead line th tion of potable water and trisodium phosphate, followed by a <br /> Potable water rin e i r rinse Groundwater at the site is present at an <br /> approximate depth of 65 fee low ound surface (bgs) and flows to the north at an <br />' approximate gradient of 0 0013 feet per foot The groundwater elevation measurements are <br /> summarized in Table 1 A groundwater gradient map is presented as Figure 3 <br /> The threeg roundwaterwells,designated MW-A(MW-1),MW-B (MW-2),and MW-C(MW-3), <br />' were also sampled On June 1, 1994, the wells were purged using a 2-Inch diameter <br /> submersible pump The submersible pump and associated hoses were decontaminated after <br /> each use with a solution of potable water and trisodium phosphate, followed by a potable <br /> water rinse and a deionized water rinse The interior and exterior of the pump and hoses <br />' were washed by submersing the equipment in the solutions and drawing wash and rinse <br /> water through the pump system A mirumum of three casing volumes were purged from <br /> each of the monitoring wells prior to collection of a water sample Temperature, pH, and <br /> specific conductance measurements were made in the field for the purpose of establishing <br /> when a representative groundwater sample could be taken Purging continued to each well <br /> until pH, temperature, and conductivity did not vary by more than 10 percent The <br /> morutortng well purge water was placed in labelled 55-gallon, DOT-approved drums and left <br /> on site in the stewardship of Caltrans Field measurements and general observations for <br /> each well were recorded on the well sampling records presented in Appendix A <br /> After purging, the water in each well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its <br /> original elevation Water samples were then collected using a disposable, Teflon, bottom- <br />' discharging bailer, transferred to an appropriate sample container, labelled, and placed in a <br /> cooler containing ice T amples were transported to Quality Assurance Laboratories for <br /> ichemical testing unde st y protocol a <br /> U <br /> 1 <br />