Laserfiche WebLink
• • Page 3 of 9 <br /> work plan, such as ADDING, moving, or removing "proposed boring' locations as shown on the <br /> figure in the WP. <br /> From you phone call just a few minutes ago, I got the impression there have been changes to <br /> what currently appears on FIGURE 5 of the work plan. IF so, send me the new map showing the <br /> changed boring locations. <br /> IF no changes, then I can process the applications assuming the money concern below is <br /> addressed. <br /> Unfortunately you sent only ONE check for ALL the applications. Typically a separate check is to <br /> accompany each application. But if your math is correct and all the necessary submittals are on <br /> my desk and I can process them all at_one_time,this works just fine with one check. But IF, as in <br /> this case, some applications are NOT going to be processed (WP 3-29-06 across the street)then <br /> the money you included in the ONE check gets either: OPTION 1- RETURN the check to you so <br /> you can re-send us (two) separate $89 checks, one per application OR, OPTION 2, the <br /> remainder/balance of the check amount is added to your account to cover inspection and office <br /> charges. I have check SAIC check#0001686677 ($457.00). After processing these two <br /> applications at $89 each, the balance will be $279.00.When it comes to processing the other <br /> applications, then an $89 check per permit application will be needed before I can process. <br /> LET ME KNOW WHICH OPTION YOU WOULD PREFER TO DO. <br /> In order to complete the processing of these applications TODAY, I need <br /> you to answer/address the following items: <br /> 1- if boring locations/number have changed from FIGURE 5 in the WP, then send me anew <br /> map and, <br /> 2- return the one large check to you OR process the two permits and put the $279 balance <br /> in your account. <br /> I have other appointments later this am and ALL afternoon. Lets get this handled in the next hour <br /> or so please. <br /> From: Slowik, William P [mailto:WILLIAM.P.SLOWIK@saic.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:32 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: Dennis, Christopher B; Anzelon, Daniel B. <br /> Subject: RE: Chevron EMC's Lyoth Site <br /> Mike, <br /> Please refer to the March 231d work plan for Lyoth Offsite. We will only be advancing the <br /> borings which appear on Figure 5 in the March 23rd Lyoth Offsite work plan. There are a <br /> total of four borings —three confirmed borings and one contingency boring—associated <br /> with this work plan. <br /> One of the confirmed borings is located on SJC assessor parcel 252-07-004, a property <br /> which is operated as Reed and Sons Towing. As you may recall, the property owner <br /> identified on the Site Access Agreement in SAIC's original permit application submittal <br /> was not up to date (he had since sold the property unbeknownst to us). We recently (late <br /> November/early December)submitted to you an updated Site Access Agreement <br /> reflecting the current property owner. <br /> The other two confirmed borings and the one contingency boring are located on Union <br /> Pacific Rail Road property (SJC assessor's parcel 252-01-003)and you have the <br /> complete and correct permit application package for this parcel. If you give us the green <br /> light, next Monday, January 8th,we'll be working on the UPRR property first and then the <br /> Reed and Sons Towing parcel. <br /> FYI, the March 29th work plan if for a site called Banta Road—UPRR which is right <br /> across the street. We have not submitted any permit applications for Banta Road — <br /> UPRR because we do not have all of our access agreements in order. Therefore,we will <br /> 1/4/2007 <br />