Laserfiche WebLink
kA KLEINFELDER <br /> 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> u <br /> The following conclusions and recommendations summarize Kleinfelder's findings. For <br /> additional details refer to the body of this report and Discussion of Findings in Section 5.- <br /> 6.1 CONCLUSIONS <br /> ` 1. Based on surveyed elevations of the four monitoring wells at the site and two depth to <br /> groundwater surveys, Kleinfelder evaluated depth to groundwater, groundwater flow <br /> direction and gradient. Based on a survey conducted on October 29, 2003 and December <br /> 18, 2003 groundwater was found to be approximately 55 to 60 feet bgs. Groundwater <br /> flow direction was calculated to the southwest at a gradient ranging from 0.010 to 0.012 <br /> ft./ft. <br /> 2. Based on the groundwater elevation data, the subject site appears to be down-gradient of <br /> the northern offsite property (Former Shell Station) and partially downgradient to cross- <br /> gradient from the trucking operation located east of the site. The CalTrans maintenance <br /> yard located south of the site appears to be down-gradient from the subject site. <br /> 3. Based on the analytical results presented in this report, no requested petroleum <br /> constituents or volatile organic compounds were detected from three groundwater <br /> samples, two collected from perimeter monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3 and one from <br /> monitoring well MW-2 (located in proximity to the former onsite UST area). A <br /> groundwater sample collected from perimeter monitoring well MW-4 was reported to <br /> contain TPH-G and three oxygenates TBA, MTBE and TAME. MTBE was detected at <br /> 790 µg/1 which exceeds State Primary and Secondary Maximum Contamination Limits <br /> for Drinking Water Standards of 13 and 5 µg/l, respectively. Since MW-4 appears to be <br /> immediately downgradient of the adjacent former Shell station (northern property <br /> boumdary), it appears that the current and or past operation of the adjacent gas station are <br /> impacting groundwater beneath the northern portion of the site, and has the potential to <br /> { impact soils on site. <br /> 4. Because no requested petroleum constituents or oxygenates were detected in groundwater <br /> samples collected from monitoring well MW-2 ( located in proximity to the former onsite <br /> UST area) or from MW-1 (situated downgradient of the former UST location), it does not <br /> appear that the former onsite UST operations have impacted groundwater beneath the <br /> former UST area. <br /> 5. TPH-D and/or TPH-MO were detected in two 4-point composite soil samples and three <br /> discrete soil samples in the washdown area. TPH-D concentrations ranged from 4.2 to 16 <br /> mg/kg. TPH-MO ranged from 4.0 to 52 mg/kg. Arsenic and Mercury were also detected <br /> in soil in this area which exceeded Residential PRG goals. However it is Kleinfelder's <br /> i <br /> i <br /> 36274/ST03RI919 Page 16 of 19 <br /> �c)2004 Kleinfelder,Inc. January 5,2004 <br /> I <br />