Laserfiche WebLink
MOM.... <br /> Potentiometric contour maps for 8 November and 9 December are presented on Figures 3-1 and <br /> 3-2 Groundwater flow was toward the northeast during both sampling periods The horizontal <br /> groundwater gradient was 0 03 and 0 02 for 8 November and 9 December, respectively <br /> Table 3-1 <br /> 1996 Field Monitoring Data <br /> Top of Ground <br /> Electrical Casing Depth to Water <br /> Conductivity Elevation (ft Water Elevation <br /> Well/Date Temperature pH (umhos) MSL) (ft) (ft MSL) <br /> 8 November 1996 <br /> MW-1 199 652 680 54 11 53 02 1 09 <br /> MW-4 192 699 290 5443 57 12 -2 69 <br /> MW-5 208 6 33 310 5424 53 49 075 <br /> 9 December 1996 <br /> MW-1 NA NA NA 54 11 53 17 1 094 <br /> MW-4 NA NA NA 5443 5622 -1 79 <br /> MW-5 199 6 80 300 5424 53 59 065 <br /> 3.4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> A summary of the analytical results of the groundwater sampling conducted on 8 November and <br /> 9 December 1996 is presented in Table 3-2 The analytical reports are presented in Appendix <br /> D Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in the groundwater samples collected on 8 <br /> November and 9 December 1996 <br /> Historical groundwater analytical results are presented in Table 3-3 Petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> have never been detected in groundwater samples collected at the site <br /> L 1PROIEC S\SANJOQWCLOD[REP 9 J nmry IM <br />