Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mike Infurna <br /> April 3, 1995 (9347-9046) <br /> Aegis Environmental, InJJ��. (Aegis) personnel supervised the drilling and sampling of ten <br /> soil borings on site in January�'1990. The borings ranged in depth from 11.5 to 21.5 feet below <br /> surface. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected from the borings did not indicate total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), as gasoline, or benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes <br /> (BTEX) above the respective PQL. Results of the investigation were documented by Aegis in <br /> the "Pre-Tank Replacement Site Assessment Results Report", dated April 13, 1990. <br /> On January 18, 1994, Aegis personnel supervised the drilling of three on site soil borings <br /> to approximately 22 feet below surface and one HydroPunchTm boring to 13 feet below surface. <br /> Static groundwater was encounterept approximately 12.5 to 14 feet below surface. The soil <br /> borings were completed as 4-inch✓diameter groundwater monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and <br /> MW-3. The results of the investigation were documented by Aegis in the "Site <br /> Investigation/Monitoring Well Installation Results Report", dated April 18, 1994. Laboratory <br /> analysis of soil samples collected from the borings did not indicate total petroleum hydrocarbons, <br /> as gasoline, or benzene above the respective PQL. The groundwater sample collected from the <br /> HydroPunchTm boring did not contain TPH, as gasoline, or BTEX compounds above the <br /> respective PQL. <br /> Previous Quarter's Activity <br /> The NET Laboratory (NET) analytical report stated the groundwater sample collected from <br /> well MW-3 on November 10, 1994 contained 0.320 ppm TPH, as gasoline, but noted a <br /> chromatogram pattern not typical of gasoline. Per the request of Mr. Mike Infurna, Fugro faxed <br /> the laboratory chromatograms for well MW-3 to the San Joaquin County Public Health Services, <br /> Environmental Health Division. <br /> The groundwater sample collected from MW-3 on February 21, 1995, was analyzed for <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8020, and for petroleum and chlorinated hydrocarbons <br /> by GUMS Method 8240. All compounds in the GUMS 8240 analysis, including BTEX, were <br /> below the respective laboratory reporting limits. However, the EPA 8020 analysis of the (MW-3)✓ <br /> groundwater sample indicated the presence of BTEX compounds ranging from 1L2 to 9.7 parts- <br /> per-billion (ppb). The 8020 a�lysis of the groundwater sample collected from✓MW-2 indicated <br /> the presence of total xylenes at 0.5 ppb. The 8020 analysis also indicated that the equipment and <br /> drip blanks eaab contained 10 ppb toluene. NET's laboratory method blank contained <br /> concentrations of toluene at Q.34 ppb- and total xylenes at 0.48 ppb. In a letter dated March 1, <br /> 1995, NET reported a consistent problem with laboratory-induced contamination of groundwater <br /> samples. The letter is included with the attached laboratory report. <br /> Next Quarter's Activity <br /> Quarterly monitoring and sampling for the site is scheduled for May 1995. <br /> 93479047.ELT .2- <br />