My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0013077
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BENJAMIN HOLT
>
2905
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544110
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0013077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2019 10:02:19 AM
Creation date
2/7/2019 9:10:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0013077
RECORD_ID
PR0544110
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003712
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #94275*
STREET_NUMBER
2905
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BENJAMIN HOLT
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09760004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2905 W BENJAMIN HOLT DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 2905 West Benjamin Holt Drive, Stockton, California March 16, 1994 <br /> Chevron U.S.A. Products Company Page 9 <br /> � g <br /> 4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION ALTERNATIVES <br /> 4.1 Overview <br /> Based on the results of previous site assessment, four alternatives for corrective action at the site are <br /> proposed as follows: <br /> N Source removal, isolation, and groundwater monitoring and sampling <br /> ■ Bio-Sparging <br /> 0 Soil vapor extraction <br /> ■ Air sparging,with soil vapor extraction <br /> An alternative for groundwater extraction and treatment is intentionally avoided since no immediate <br /> threat exists to the local water supply. The use of a hydrocarbon mass removal aeration technology, <br /> such as vapor extraction, air sparging or bio-sparging, targeted at the source of hydrocarbons (former <br /> UST pit), will induce shrinkage of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume. In-situ remediation technologies are <br /> preferred to avoid disruption of operations at this newly remodeled service station existing on site. A <br /> brief description of the implementation, objectives and effectiveness of each alternative are summarized <br /> below. <br /> 4.2 Source Removal, Isolation, and Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> The objectives of this alternative are to remove the active sources of groundwater contamination, <br /> delineate all hydrocarbon-impacted soil and groundwater, and to establish an effective groundwater <br /> monitoring program that demonstrates containment of the contaminant plume. Implementation of this <br /> alternative began with the removal of the former UST's, associated piping, and hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil in 1989. <br /> Periodic groundwater monitoring and sampling would continue at the site to monitor site conditions. All <br /> monitoring wells would be gauged for depth to water to determine the magnitude and direction of <br /> groundwater flow beneath the site, and sampled to determine the concentration of dissolved BTEX and <br /> TPH-G. The objectives of the monitoring and sampling program would be to monitor the effects of <br /> natural attenuation of hydrocarbons in groundwater and to assure that the dissolved phase <br /> �✓ 5073PAR.RPr g r <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> �I! TECHNOLOGY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.