Laserfiche WebLink
-, field and laboratory sources of variance. As shown on Table 3 <br /> where hydrocarbon constituents have been detected over the last 4 <br /> sampling events they have generally been very close to the method <br /> detection limits (MDL) . The determination of actual concentra- <br /> tions, if they are near the MDL is difficult, Ms. Laura Kuck (lab <br /> director, Applied Analytical ) reported that the small discrepancy <br /> between the results of the two replicate analysis (MW2 and MW4 ) <br /> relates to laboratory variation. Table 4 shows the laboratory <br /> results including sample spike recovery percentage for both <br /> samples. The table shows that three separate runs were made for <br /> sample MW2. This is because the spike recovery ( 74$ ) for the <br /> first run was below the quality control minimum of 75$. there- <br /> fore two additional sample runs were made. These runs showed <br /> significantly improved spike recoveries ( 104$ and 99t) . The <br /> third run was selected as the best representation based on spike <br /> recovery and it is presented on the laboratory report. <br /> The Table 4 data gives an indication of the variation which can <br /> occur within the laboratory and which probably is an important <br /> part of the data variability noted in the quarterly sampling <br /> results. With this source of data "inconclusiveness" in mind, <br /> together with the fact that only benzene, in 1 of the 4 sample <br /> rounds collected to date, has been present above State MCL's (3.7 <br /> ppb) we believe our request for reduction of sampling require- <br /> ments to semi annual should be reconsidered. <br /> The next sampling event is scheduled for April 1991, pending the <br /> -" divisions reconsideration of the sampling frequency requirements. <br /> The monthly monitoring has shown that groundwater gradient is <br /> influenced by the tides and fluctuates in direction (Table 2) . <br /> The tidal influence is relatively clear from the data presented <br /> on Table 2. During low tide the river controlled gradient would <br /> be expected to be dominantly down river or northwesr 'the-,,,only <br /> gx�Ra�nt ''�iaterm3n�t;ion 'iirade�onrt'he�1�a5w� t�da��(�U8�320�/90)��is� "t�h�• <br /> A. <br /> tte ,gr�dient has��h$d�a �norttae`rlpy�r�conbiient��° "rSim3ar3y <br /> de'�ermna� ons made 3o"n °[iz'rt`�eart,Fth�e';:.h''��':l�r�,t`�i:aB x - <br /> J (P�4y , 90, x9/10/90, <br /> 11/30/90, 01/07/91} are in the up river or sdfi 14th,The measurements taken between the high"and '1'ow generally <br /> have a westerly component which probably reflects the swinging of <br /> the gradient from south-southeast to northwest. <br /> As requested in December 17, 1990 correspondence by Laurie A. <br /> Cotulla, the traffic box for well MW1 has been replaced and the <br /> box for well MW3 has been repaired. <br />