Laserfiche WebLink
Section 5.0 <br /> Engineering Analyses and <br /> Recommendations <br /> �. 5.1 Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination <br /> We selected the environmental laboratory tests based on the compounds documented <br /> as being released on site. These test indicate only the presence of non-fecal coliform <br /> bacteria. Based on these results and the absence of any visual or odor indication of <br /> other contamination during our field investigation,we judge that the risk of <br /> encountering other compounds not tested for during the investigation is low. <br /> The soil stockpiled during our field investigation can be disposed of at a Class III <br /> landfill. The liquids in the 55-gallon drums can be disposed at a water recycling <br /> facility or, more conveniently, discharged to the sewage system for treatment at the <br /> City-operated facility. <br /> ;6- Groundwater collected during construction should be disinfected prior to treatment <br /> and discharge,or discharged into the sanitary wet well for treatment at the City <br /> L wastewater treatment facility. <br /> 5.2 Groundwater Control <br /> AP. Care must be exercised when relying on a single in situ falling head permeability test <br /> to predict groundwater inflows or design a dewatering system. The permeability <br /> measured by the test(23.7 feet/day or 8.4 x 10-3 cm/sec) does fall in the range of well- <br /> sorted sand to well-sorted gravel (Fetter, 1994),which is representative of the soils <br /> encountered in the borings between about 20 and 35 feet bgs. However, the actual <br /> permeability likely varies considerably,both vertically and laterally. <br /> The data does confirm that dewatering of an open excavation is not likely to be <br /> practical. The high groundwater table and relatively permeable soils near the base of <br /> the pump station suggest that dewatering would cause settlements that could deform <br /> and further damage the pump station,the wet pit,and the existing pipes. In addition, <br /> given the close proximity to the adjacent Calaveras River,the water-bearing sandy <br /> layer is likely hydraulically connected to the river,which could lead to large <br /> dewatering volumes. <br /> 5.3 Construction Alternatives <br /> We considered two basic alternatives for construction of the new wall. The first is to <br /> .. construct the new wall adjacent to the existing wall using a form of in situ <br /> construction. The second is to use temporary excavation support in combination with <br /> conventional formed concrete construction of the new wall. These alternatives are <br /> discussed below. <br /> 5 <br /> CDM Camp Dresser&McKee inc. 5-1 <br /> O;M=28248-GEO-74-Repo"=kside Pump Station.doc <br />