My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CO0016853
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STOKES
>
1033
>
2500 – Emergency Response Program
>
CO0016853
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2022 9:31:58 AM
Creation date
2/12/2019 11:37:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2500 – Emergency Response Program
RECORD_ID
CO0016853
PE
2547
FACILITY_NAME
CHEMICAL TRANSFER CO
STREET_NUMBER
1033
STREET_NAME
STOKES
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
11/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
1033 STOKES AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
11/25/2001 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\S\STOKES\1033\CO0016853.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cleanup activities generally proceeded as follows: <br /> 1. EI arrived at the site at 9 AM, November 26, 2001. The Work Plan and H & S Plan were <br /> reviewed with company personnel who were participating in the cleanup. A copy of the <br /> Work Plan and H & S Plan was kept at the site during the cleanup, and a copy was given to <br /> Mr. Knoll of San Joaquin County Public Health Services. <br /> 2. An inspection of the affected area revealed several liquid pools, which tested pH 2 to 3 using <br /> litmus paper. Sampling and testing was repeated at several locations in both directions from <br /> the tank dome. Testing east of the rail car dome did not reveal any contamination. Testing <br /> west of the dome revealed contamination up to approximately 120 ft. from the dome. Lime <br /> rock was spread over the affected area and the liquid pools were filled with lime rock, which <br /> reacted immediately with the acid. Lime rock was used as the neutralizing chemical of choice <br /> due to the fact that it neutralizes acid on contact, but remains essentially inert in the absence <br /> of acid (i.e. lime rock does not result in high pH when used in excess). <br /> 3. EI requested CTC to have the rail cars removed from the affected area, and to prepare and <br /> provide at the site, several hundred gallons of sodium hydroxide of pH 10 (pH 10 was <br /> selected to avoid over neutralizing, leaving areas of high pH). The site was then left to allow <br /> reaction between the acid and lime rock to continue. <br /> 4. EI returned to the site on November 27, 2001. The rail cars had been removed, providing <br /> better access to the affected area. Sampling and testing (with litmus paper) were conducted, <br /> revealing areas of low pH. Spent lime rock was picked up from the track area and piled in <br /> another area at the site. It tested neutral with litmus paper. pH 10 sodium hydroxide was <br /> sprayed over the low pH areas, and the site left to allow neutralization to take place. <br /> 5. Heavy rain prevented neutralization efforts on November 28, 2001. <br /> 6. Sampling and testing on November 29, 2001, again revealed areas of low pH. pH 10 sodium <br /> hydroxide solution was applied to the track area where the release occurred (rail car dome <br /> area), and allowed to flow down the tracks as the hydrochloric acid had done during the <br /> release. The site was then left to allow the neutralization to proceed. <br /> 7. Sampling and testing on November 30, 2001 showed that most of the affected area was near <br /> Environeering,Inc. Project No.01-011.25 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.