Laserfiche WebLink
Underground Storage Tank Delineation Sampling Using Cone Penetration Testing <br /> With An Ultra-Violet Optical Screening Tool Report <br /> 216 N.California Street <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br /> borings at each location, see Figure 3, Appendix A. Qualitative analysis of the data, in terms of date of <br /> sampling and analysis, or spatial trends, support the use of the data for the intended use, to define the <br /> vertical and lateral extent of hydrocarbon contamination on this Site. <br /> 4.0 DATA ANALYSIS <br /> UVOST data indicates that hydrocarbons were present at the locations of CPT1, CPT2 and CPT3. <br /> UVOST data indicates that the majority of hydrocarbons is present near the current groundwater level, <br /> and may form a sorbed phase (soil) diesel plume. The plume thins and becomes shallower with greater <br /> lateral distance from the source. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected at depths 72, 80, and 100 <br /> feet below the surface in CPT1 had been impacted by hydrocarbons quantified as diesel and small <br /> concentrations of ethyl benzene and xylenes, but at concentrations that are 300 times lower than the <br /> sample collected at 60 feet below ground surface. A similar spatial trend was indicated by the laboratory <br /> data for the groundwater samples and may form an aqueous phase(dissolved) diesel plume. Groundwater <br /> collected at a depth of 61 feet at CPT1 had a laboratory reported diesel concentration of 3,600 pg/L while <br /> a ground water sample collected two feet away laterally and at a depth of 75 feet, 14 feet deeper, did not <br /> have a diesel concentration that was at or above the laboratory reported detection limit of 50 pg/l, or <br /> about 70 times lower and better than CRWQCB water quality goals. <br /> Soil and groundwater samples that were collected at close depth intervals indicate a strong correlation <br /> between diesel concentrations in soil and diesel concentrations in groundwater. Soil sample CPT1-60 had <br /> a diesel concentration of 3,500 mg/kg and groundwater sample CPT1-61 had a diesel concentration of <br /> .. 3,600 pg/L. Soil sample CPT1-72 had a diesel concentration of 230 mg/kg and groundwater sample <br /> CPT1-75 had a diesel concentration of less than 50 pg/L. Soil sample CPT2-35 had a diesel <br /> concentration of 4,600 mg/kg and groundwater sample CPT2-41 had a diesel concentration of 5,800 <br /> pg/L. The three pairs of data indicate that groundwater concentrations are approximately one-thousandth <br /> of the soil concentrations. <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Soil and groundwater grab samples combined with the use of CPT and UVOST systems have provided <br /> _ sufficient data to develop a preliminary site conceptual model (see Figure 5, Appendix A). Spatial trends <br /> interpreted from available data indicate that heating oil, quantified as diesel, was released from the <br /> vicinity of the storage tank, transported downward due to gravity, and adsorbed to fine grain soils. The <br /> _ body of diesel thins with distance laterally from the source, and attenuates to lower concentrations both <br /> laterally and vertically. The weak correlation of UVOST data and laboratory data may indicate that the <br /> distribution of hydrocarbon concentrations within the plume is heterogeneous. Based on the limited data <br /> collected during this investigation, UVOST may be useful for defining diesel contamination in soil at <br /> concentrations greater than 1,00 mg/kg. The highest sorbed phase diesel concentration reported in <br /> laboratory analytical data based on soil samples collected during this phase of the investigation was <br /> 4,600 mg/kg in sample CPT2-35. The liquid phase or sorbed phase diesel intersected the water table at <br /> some time in the past and interacted to form an aqueous phase diesel plume that is collocated with the <br /> sorbed phase plume. Aqueous phase hydrocarbons may be transported at greater velocities, or distances <br /> through coarser grained materials, including sands or historic stream channels that have been present at <br /> the location of the Site, see Figure 6, Appendix A. <br /> The full lateral and vertical extent of the sorbed phase and aqueous phase diesel plume has not been <br /> •• demonstrated,based upon data collected during this phase of the investigation. Laboratory analytical data <br /> indicates that lower concentrations of diesel were present in soil samples collected from CPT1 at depths <br /> 4M <br /> i4) CONDOR <br />