My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
216
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544146
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 11:57:49 AM
Creation date
2/14/2019 11:36:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544146
PE
3527
FACILITY_ID
FA0015804
FACILITY_NAME
VACANT LOT
STREET_NUMBER
216
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13925026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
216 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 3 <br /> w.� <br /> Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> From: Gareth Stamp [GStamp@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:36 AM <br /> To: Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: State Water Resource Control Boards Soils Only Case Follow Up Program <br /> Lori, <br /> I did not realize the media of concern had changed. Yes I am referring to the risk page on GT. <br /> Thanks for the quick responses. <br /> Gareth Stamp <br /> >>> "Lori Duncan [EH]" <Iduncan@sjcehd.com> 8/25/2010 10:25 AM >>> <br /> Gareth, <br /> Where is that exactly in Geotracker? We've been looking for what you are referring to and cannot find it. I am <br /> not comfortable OK-ing you changing something when I am not sure what it even is. <br /> Are you referring to the Risk Information page? If so, it states for this project the media of concern is 'aquifer <br /> used for drinking water supply' and 'soil', and at this stage of the investigation I think it is appropriate to have <br /> both. There is contamination in the soil at this site, above the water table, that is contributing to the problem. <br /> Lori <br /> From: Gareth Stamp [mailto:GStamp@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:36 AM <br /> To: Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: State Water Resource Control Boards Soils Only Case Follow Up Program <br /> Lori, <br /> Would you like me to go ahead and change the media of concern on the 216 california site? <br /> Gareth Stamp <br /> >>> "Lori Duncan [EH]" <Iduncan@sjcehd.com> 8/24/2010 4:12 PM >>> <br /> No, I don't. A grab groundwater sample from a boring had a reported 560,000 micrograms per liter TPH <br /> diesel., though of course this needs to be confirmed with wells. <br /> There is an approved work plan to continue the investigation at this site, and install wells, but the city <br /> has no money to implement it at this time. <br /> Lori <br /> From: Gareth Stamp [mailto:GStamp@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:25 PM <br /> To: Lori Duncan [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: State Water Resource Control Boards Soils Only Case Follow Up Program <br /> Lori, <br /> Thanks for the quick response. Do you think the media of concern on the 216 California site should <br /> be Soils only? <br /> Thanks, <br /> 8/25/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.