Laserfiche WebLink
�./ `rte <br /> to a depth of eighty-five feet(see a recap attached). <br /> On May 2 and 3, 2000 the soil borings for both MW#5 and MW#6 were made as described in the <br /> Work Plan of 3/17/2000.Monitoring wells were installed in both of these soil bores. The Work Plan <br /> of 3/17/2000 also included a soil bore and monitoring well(MW#4)to be installed in the sidewalk <br /> on the north side of Lafayette Street. This soil bore was not completed as planned. An unknown <br /> underground storage tank was encountered in the direct path of the soil bore. As a result of this <br /> encounter,the soil bore was abandoned and the local agencies were notified. <br /> CPT#3 was installed on June 13,2000 in the Caltrans right of way. This CPT is northeast of the site, <br /> and the data gathered is in the report issued for that work. <br /> All monitoring wells have been sampled quarterly, and a recap of the findings is attached. <br /> A Work Plan to expand the horizontal definition of the contamination plume was approved in <br /> December of 2000. This Work Plan called for the installation of three new CPT's within the <br /> Caltrans RAV to the north of the project site. These CPT's were completed on March 8, 2001 and <br /> soil and water samples were extracted to a depth of 125 feet. Also, included in the Work Plan of <br /> December 2000 was the installation and testing of four new monitoring wells, (MW-8S,MW-8D, <br /> MW-7,MW-9) to be placed on the project site or the adjacent property. These monitoring wells <br /> were completed on April 11, 2001. <br /> In January of 2002 the owners of this property removed the apartment house structure on the east <br /> side of the property. At the time of this report that portion of the property is clear without any <br /> structures or other improvements. <br /> Theory <br /> The major hydraulic properties of aquifers on a site can best be determined through a pump draw <br /> down test. The theory requires a steady state flow that produces a draw-down in the surrounding <br /> monitoring wells. Aquifers with high permeability require only short duration pumping,while low <br /> permeability aquifers require much longer pumping time to produce an acceptable draw-down <br /> curve. The draw-down curve is then used to determine extraction well pumping rates and the area <br /> of influence to determine extraction well spacing. Dupuit Theory of Unconfined Flow is proposed <br /> for determining both the"V factor and the projected"Q"for the first sand aquifer. The extraction <br /> well spacing will be determined by the radius of influence of the pump test well. <br /> In general the site has three sand aquifers. The first is located from twenty-five to thirty feet below <br /> the surface and is a fine sand. The second is located from forty to fifty-five feet below the surface. <br /> The third aquifer is located about seventy feet below the surface and is made up of sandy silts and <br /> fine sand. This aquifer is only about five to ten feet thick. Drill logs of MW-6 and push logs of <br /> CPT-1 and CPT-2 were used as foundation data for aquifer determination. <br /> The highest levels of TPHg are found in the second aquifer. MW-1 has continually produced <br /> groundwater samples with TPHg ranging from 200,000 to 100,000 ppb. This well is screened from <br /> thirty-seven to fifty-seven feet below the surface. This well produces high flow rates.The estimated <br /> "k"factor for the second aquifer is one times ten to the minus one. <br /> 2 <br />