Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> 22 February 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0481 <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> butanol (TBA), or total lead in soil sample B-1-9.5' (Table 2). Results of the initial site assessment <br /> work were presented in a Ietter report to the PHS-EHD, dated 04 December 1998. The letter report <br /> included the recommendation that the preliminary site assessment be continued utilizing hollow-stem <br /> auger drilling techniques. <br /> On 28 January 1999, the preliminary site assessment was continued using a hollow-stern auger drill <br /> rig. One soil boring, SB-1, was completed at the former location of the eastern fuel dispenser <br /> corresponding to UST removal soil sample S-4-FDe (Figure 3). Soil boring SB-1 was advanced to <br /> a depth of 31 feet bsg. There were no reported detections of BTEX, TPH-d, TPH-g, DIPE, ETBE, <br /> MTBE, TAME, or TBA in the soil samples collected from soil boring SB-1 at depths of I 1 feet bsg, <br /> 26.5 feet bsg, and 31 feet bsg (Table 2). Total lead was detected only in soil sample SB-1-11', and <br /> was present at a concentration of 4.7 mg/kg (Table 2). The laboratory analytical report is presented <br /> in Appendix A. The soil sample analytical results from soil boring SB-1 indicated that the relatively <br /> low levels of petroleum hydrocarbons previously detected in soil sample S-4-Me appear localized <br /> and have not significantly migrated. <br /> During site assessment activities, soil boring SB-2 was attempted at the former location of the <br /> western fuel dispenser corresponding to UST removal soil samples S-4-FDw and S-8-El (Figure 3). <br /> However, during the advancement of soil boring SB-2, an active gasoline (super) product line for <br /> the operating service station was inadvertently encountered and ruptured. The active product line had <br /> not been properly located on the engineer's as-built construction plan. Soil boring SB-2 could not <br /> be advanced following the product line rupture. It is estimated that the rupture of the product line <br /> resulted in the release of approximately 3.7 to 6.9 gallons of gasoline. Calculation of the volume of <br /> the release is presented below. <br /> • 23 feet of piping from rupture to dispenser(up-gradient) x 0.16* gal/ft = 3.68 gallons <br /> • 40 feet of total piping from UST to dispenser(including the length of piping down-gradient <br /> of the rupture) x 0.16* gal/ft = 6.88 gallons <br /> *-Volume of 2-inch diameter pipe=0.16 gal/ft <br /> On 01 February 1999, during the repair of the product line, AGE collected two soil samples from <br /> beneath the area of the product line rupture (Figure 3). The soil samples were collected from soil <br /> boring HA-I utilizing a hand-auger and a slide-hammer soil sampler fitted with brass sampling <br /> sleeves. Soil samples were collected from boring HA-1 at depths of 6 feet bsg and 7.5 feet bsg. Soil <br /> sample analytical results are presented in Table 2. As shown on Table 2, BTEX, TPH-g, and MTBE <br /> were detected in soil samples HA-1-6' and HA-1-7.5'. However, TPH-g and benzene were not <br /> reported in soil samples HA-1-6' and HA-1-7.5', respectively. The laboratory analytical report is <br /> presented in Appendix A. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />