Laserfiche WebLink
-J 6 <br /> f <br /> Vogue Cleaners 1 Helen Htg�ins _ <br /> 2315 N. California St., Stockton <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Using USEPA-MCL guidelines, FE implied that the area of significant impact <br /> included only monitoring wells MW-3S, MW 5S and MW-51D. Monitoring well <br /> MW-3S is consistently impacted by bent ne, TPH-g, and 1,2-DCA, and <br /> monitoring wells MW-5S and MW-51D are consistently impacted by 1,2-DCA. <br /> SJCEHD re-evaluated the impact using CAE A values and concluded that the <br /> impact to the subsurface is larger and.include MW-1, MW-2S, MW-3S, MW-3D, <br /> MW-5S and MW-5D. CAEPA-MCL concentrations were exceeded in MW-2S, <br /> MW-1, MW-21D, MW-31D by 1,2-DCA; MVV-3S, MW-5S, and MW-SD are <br /> impacted by cis-1,2-DCA; and MW-3S is impacted by vinyl chloride. <br /> Sand encountered from 40'-50' bgs in MW-1, soil-boring BH-1, and MW-3 may <br /> represent a NW-SE trending channel that could be a significant migration <br /> pathway for contaminants when site groundwater is above 50' bgs. A deeper <br /> sand with unknown vertical extent is present at 70' bgs in MW-4 and MW-3 and <br /> appears to extend to 75' bgs in MW-2, M -5, MW 4, and MW-3. A high <br /> potential for this zone to act as a contaminant migration pathway exists. FE <br /> estimated thickness of the 1,2-DCA plume a 25 feet. SJCEHD considers this <br /> most likely to be an underestimation, as the vertical extent of 1,2-DCA impacted <br /> ground water has not been demonstrated. <br /> FE estimated that contaminant concentrations are declining 6% per year and <br /> presented three plots to demonstrate the decline. SJCEHD notes that if the <br /> initial benzene concentration in MW-3S is excluded, the concentration trend will <br /> show a gradual increase of benzene over time. The reported decline is totally <br /> dependent on a single concentration that may not be representative of aquifer <br /> conditions .of the time, but was probably boosted by the disruption of soil and <br /> ground water caused during installation of the well. The same observation holds <br /> for the 1,2-DCA concentration trend; disrega d the initial concentration and the <br /> trend actually appears to be increasing. The TPH-g concentrations appear to <br /> hold steady over time within a certain range of concentrations. Only the last <br /> concentration appears to be significantly lower, and one datum point does not <br /> demonstrate a trend. The two trend lines labeled "6% per year" on the 1,2-DCA <br /> plot cannot both be 6% decline lines as they would have to be parallel if plotted <br /> on the same set of coordinate axis. <br /> FE recommended in the SCM that the. newly discovered well inside the building <br /> be properly destroyed. The construction details of this well should be <br /> ascertained (with a down-hole video survey if a well log is unavailable) and <br /> included in a work plan along with the techniques to properly destroy it. The <br /> work plan should be submitted to SJCEHD in a short and timely manner. <br /> SJCEHD is concerned that the construction o MW-1 creates the potential for the <br /> well to be capable of supporting vertical mic ration of contaminants as the well <br /> may be screened across two separate sand z nes. <br />