My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
2315
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544152
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 8:10:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 4:41:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544152
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004062
FACILITY_NAME
VOGUE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12538016
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 3 <br /> area of the well, then it is an unknown, and NOT qualified for pressure grout. one example-of <br /> this is an air sparge well with a micro-pore tip. why no soil data, what can I say. too fate to <br /> whine about that now. but if NO gw sampling possible,, available and there's also NO soil data, <br /> then we use the thinking that if it is a 'remediation' we 1, it was put in a 'dirty' area to remediate ' <br /> the subsurface. dirty area, dirty well. so w/o data to support it's clean, default to unknown, <br /> then NO pressure grout. <br /> still not clear... <br /> according to you more recent email, get me another set of questions over the next year... <br /> and by the way, unmonitored monitoring wells are a violation of the County Well Ordinance. <br /> Check your last date of monitoring for this site's wells you'll need to 'monitor' them again with <br /> in a year from that date. You'll have to go out there aid check each well to verify it's status, <br /> generate a letter to me telling me you monitored each well and that it's ok, secure, and the in <br /> good repair. <br /> unmonitored monitoring wells are considered abandoned after one year. <br /> From: Michael Vlach [mailto:michaelvlach@comcast.net] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:58 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Vogue Pressure Grout Decision Criteria <br /> Mike-To what extent does the last soil data come into e fect? If the soil data for the bore hole has a hit <br /> for chemicals does that exclude a well from pressure grouting, even though the water data may be <br /> clean? May thinking is that a well test clean is a proven clean well. <br /> -Mike <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20114:29 PM <br /> To: Michael Vlach <br /> Subject: RE: Vogue Pressure Grout Decision Criteria <br /> mike.. <br /> #1- CURRENT gw data, most current, or lasts it data indicates > detection limits, NOT <br /> qualified for PRESSURE GROUT. <br /> #2- go by detections. <br /> #3- not a problem if well getting destroyed is NEI. <br /> #4-Chloroform counts. if detectable, NOT qualified for pressure grout. <br /> #5- Precision, Woodward, maybe V&W, and possibly Cascade. <br /> From: Michael Vlach [maiito:michaelviach@comc st.net] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:23 PM <br /> 6/9/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.