My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000669
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CAPITOL
>
6421
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522496
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000669
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 6:24:49 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 3:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000669
RECORD_ID
PR0522496
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015317
FACILITY_NAME
FLAG CITY CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
6421
STREET_NAME
CAPITOL
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95245
APN
05532024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6421 CAPITOL AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 31 January 2003 <br /> A'GE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br />' Page 5 of 17 <br /> Laboratory analysis of pump-and-treat effluent grab water samples collected on 21 November and <br />' on 05 December 2002 did not detect any petroleum constituents of concern, nitrate as NO3 was <br /> detected at concentrations of 40 mg/1 and 40 mg/l, respectively, TDS values were reported at 577 <br /> r mg/1 and 570 mg/l, respectively Analytical results are summarized In Tables I and 2, laboratory <br /> reports are in Appendices B and C <br /> I A bloassay laboratory analysis was performed on the grab sample collected from the effluent stream <br /> on 03 December 2002 The analysis utilized sample factors of 0 milliliter (ml), 125 ml, 500 ml, <br /> 1,000 ml, 1,500 ml and 2,000 ml Each sample factor was tested with 20 Fathead minnow fish and <br /> a dilution volume of 2,000 ml of di-ionized water, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature <br /> parameters were monitored and fish mortalities were counted over 96 hours The results of the <br /> bioassay analysis did not indicate any trends for pH, DO or temperature over,the 96 hour period <br /> Temperature measurements generally vaned between 19 4 and 20 4 degrees Celsius (°C), pH <br /> measurements vaned between 7 20 and 7 50 and DO measurements vaned between 6 10 mg/1 and <br /> 8 40 mg/1 The laboratory reported that there were zero fish mortalities after 96 hours in the above <br /> referenced sample, laboratory analysis of a duplicate effluent sample reported zero fish mortalities <br /> after 96 hours The bioassay analysis Is summarized in Table 3, laboratory reports are in <br /> Appendix C , <br /> • Utilizing an ICM water analyzer in the field, EC values were monitored on 21 November and on <br /> 05 December 2002 at 1,042 µmhos/cm and 939 µmhos/cm,respectively,pH values were monitored <br /> at 7 64 and 7 34, respectively, and temperature values at 214 °C and 21 0 °C, respectively Field <br /> monitoring results are summarized In Table 2 <br /> Utilizing a Blue-White Industries F-2000 flow meter, flow rates were measured and recorded on <br /> 21 November and on 05 December 2002 at 24 77 GPM and 23 78 GPM (Appendix A) <br /> 2 6 RECEIVING WATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> In accordance with the requirements of RWQCB Monitoring and Reporting Program No 5-00-119, <br /> monthly ground water pump-and-treat receiving water(R-1 and R-2)monitoring was performed for <br /> total dissolved solids, flow rate, specific conductivity (EC), pH and turbidity Observations noted <br /> In a log book(Appendix A) included floating or suspended matter, discoloration,bottom deposits, <br /> aquatic life, visible film-sheen-coatings, fungi and potential nuisance conditions <br /> Water monitoring could not be performed from R-1 during the 21 November and 05 December 2002 <br /> monthly monitoring events because there was no upstream water flow Because there was no <br /> Iupstream flow at R-1, the downstream flow rate at R-2 appeared to be equal to the ground water <br /> pump and treat effluent flow rate of approximately 24 77 GPM and 23 78 GPM,,respectively <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.