Laserfiche WebLink
� 1 r <br />15 July 2002 <br />AGE -NC Project No 96-0232 <br />Page 11 of 21 <br />• towards a slight depression In the water table located between Flag City Chevron wells <br />MW -6B and MW -9A and towards the northwest in the area of Flag City Chevron wells <br />MW -11A, MW -12B and MW -13B during May 2002 (Figure 8), and <br />• bi-directional towards a northwest -plunging depression of the water table in the area of Flag <br />City Chevron wells MW -6B and MW -9A during June 2002 (Figure 9) <br />Ground water gradients were estimated to be 0 002 ft/ft or less for all three ground water monitoring <br />events <br />3 4 13 Secondary Aquifer Zone <br />Ground water elevation data collected in the Secondary Aquifer Zone (85 to 105 feet bsg) was <br />inferred to be <br />• <br />bi-directional toward an apparent north -plunging depression of the water table in the area of <br />Flag City Chevron wells MW -8B and MW -9B during April 2002 (Figure 10), <br />• <br />bi-directional toward,an apparent north -plunging depression of the water table In the area of <br />Flag City Chevron wells MW -9B and MW -11C during May 2002 (Figure 11), and <br />• bi-directional toward an apparent north -plunging depression of the water table in the area <br />of Flag City Chevron wells MW -8B and MW -9B during June 2002 (Figure 12) <br />Ground water gradients were estimated to be 0 001 ti/ft or less for all three ground water monitoring <br />events <br />3 4 14 Primm Aquifer Zone <br />Ground water elevation data collected in the Primary Aquifer Zone (130 to 150 feet bsg) was inferred <br />to be <br />• bi-directional toward an apparent southwest -plunging depression of the water table in the <br />area of Flag City Chevron wells MW -8C, MW -9C, MW -11D and MW -12D during April <br />2002 (Figure 13), <br />• toward the northwest during May 2002 (Figure 14), and <br />• bi-directional toward an apparent northwest -plunging depression of the water table in the <br />area of Flag City Chevron wells MW -8C and MW -9C during June 2002 (Figure 15) <br />Ground water gradients were estimated to be 0 001 ft/ft or less for all three ground water monitoring <br />events <br />Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc <br />