Laserfiche WebLink
. 15 July 2002 <br />AGE -NC Protect No 96-0232 <br />Page 16 of 21 <br />• Due to the low ground water gradient at the site, small variations in ground water <br />measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br />modify the inferred ground water flow direction <br />• Increasing ground water elevations have been reported at the site between September 2001 <br />and the March 2002 monitoring events, however, a decrease in ground water elevation was <br />reported between March and June 2002 Hydrographs depicting recorded ground water <br />elevations at wells MW -2, MW -6A and MW -6B vs time are provided in Appendix I <br />• The highest on-site concentrations of dissolved MTBE were detected in the samples <br />collected from First Zone extraction well EW -4 at 29 µg/1 and from Second Zone monitoring <br />well MW -8A at 250 µg/l, low concentrations of on -sate MTBE were detected in water <br />samples from First Zone extraction wells EW -5, EW -6, EW -8 and EW -10, and from Second <br />Zone monitoring well MW -9A (Table 6, Figures 16,17 and 18) <br />• The highest off-site concentrations of MTBE were detected from from Rocky's Upper Zone <br />well MW -I IB at 120 ,ug/l, in First Zone water from Flag City Chevron monitoring well <br />MW -7 at 49 4g11, and in Three B's Truck Plaza monitoring well MW -4 at 90 µg/1(Table 6, <br />. Appendix F) <br />• On isolated occurrences, low concentrations of TPH-d have been detected at vanous wells <br />during previous quarterly monitoring events at Flag City Chevron Low concentrations of <br />TPH-d were detected from First Zone at MW- 1OA, MW -12A and MW -13A, from Second <br />Zone at MW -12B and MW -13B, from Upper Rocky's Zone at MW -10C, from secondary <br />aquifer at MW -9B, MW -1 OD, MW -11 C, MW -12C and MW -13C, and from Primary Aquifer <br />at MW -9C, MW -11D, MW -12D and MW -13D during the June 2002 monitoring event <br />Therefore, AGE requested McCampbell Analytical to further review the TPH-d sample <br />chromatograms from during the June 2002 sampling event The laboratory indicated to AGE <br />that the low TPH-d detections from MW -9, MW -10 and MW -11 did not have typical diesel <br />characteristics, and that the detected chromatogram peaks were probably the result of <br />biological interference <br />6.0. SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL <br />Based on the data collected to date, AGE has developed a site conceptual model for the release, <br />migration and distribution of the contaminants in the subsurface as described below The model is <br />diagrammatically illustrated in Figure 21 <br />• A release or releases of petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE occurred from an unidentified <br />source(s) on the site Possible sources, all in the same general area, include impacted soil left <br />in place at the time of the UST replacements, wash -down water from the dispenser area <br />Advanced GeoEnvironenental, 1— <br />