Laserfiche WebLink
a� <br /> Mitigation Measures: Prior to disturbance of any soil at the project site, an asbestos survey <br /> on the underground drains and piping will be conducted by a California certified asbestos <br /> If consultant Upon completion of their Limited Phase Il Assessment,Kleinfelder(1997b, <br /> ' Appendix D)did not recommend any further investigation or clean-up actions for the site In ' <br /> Addendum No I to the Phase II Assessment(1997c, Appendix D)KIemfelder reported on the <br /> results of additional tests and field explorations conducted at the ARCO Service Station <br /> located at 205 North Center Street No hydrocarbons were detected at the excavated depths ' <br /> 14 Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant <br /> Implementation and Monitoring Program ' <br /> Implementation Public Works Department <br /> y Monitoring Public Works will ensure that a California certified asbestos consultant conducts , <br /> h an asbestos survey on the underground drams and piping at the project site The results and <br /> + any recommendations will be reported to the Public Works Department who will then inform <br /> the City of Stockton,Community Development Dept If any cleanup procedures are required, ' <br /> Public Works will verify that they are performed in accordance with applicable state, federal, <br /> !I and local regulations,and will inform the Community Development Dept when they are <br /> completed , <br /> i <br /> c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan? <br /> i <br /> ' Answer: No <br /> 1' Level of Significance. Not significant <br /> Mitigation Measures: None required <br /> i` Significance after Mitigation: NIA t <br /> t <br /> 18. AESTHETICS <br /> a Will the proposal result in <br /> a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,or will the proposal result in � <br /> the creation of an aesthetically-offensive site open to the public view9 <br /> Answer: No The proposed protect will greatly improve the overall aesthetic appearance of <br /> !; the wall and provide a stable subgrade to allow future surface improvements to Weber Point <br /> Park <br /> Level of Significance:Not significant r ' <br /> i <br /> Mitigation Measures:None required E <br /> " Significance after Mitigation N/A , <br /> a+ <br /> 19. CULTURAL RESOURCES , <br /> Will the proposal <br /> a' Result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site <br /> Answer. The EIR prepared for the Amended West End Urban Renewal Project No 1,which <br /> s� <br /> included the area of the proposed Weber Point Southbank Seawall, stated that <br /> i� <br /> �I EX ISM DOC 9125/973 2 <br />