Laserfiche WebLink
1. FS objectives and goals <br /> 2. Agency roles <br /> 3. Data gaps (general) <br /> Let's examine the variations that may take place with regards to proceeding with the <br /> FS versus collecting any more data <br /> DRIVERS: <br /> What is your understanding of the drivers involved? <br /> • Desired outcome/risks <br /> • Schedule <br /> • PG&E budget(general) <br /> Response: <br /> Fran, Fernando, Bob and Philip: Desire good quality information to be able to <br /> make decisions. <br /> Money will be better spent with good planning and fewer <br /> iterations. <br /> DTSC needs to see progress. <br /> Schedule measures progress for DTSC management. <br /> Tricia Sullivan: Allow time in the schedule for meetings. <br /> Variation 1 vs 2 <br /> Variation 1 proposed proceeding with the FS followed by collecting data based on <br /> the recommended alternative. Variation 2 proposed agreement on specific data needs <br /> followed by data collection and the FS. <br /> Fran Anderson: Would like to see a combination of Variations 1 and 2 where <br /> data collection and proceding with the feasibility study take <br /> place at the same time. <br /> Also look at biodegradation of PNAs. <br /> Philip Isorena: Mentioned the VISIT model; we need to see if Jeff Morrison <br /> has access to it. Philip Isorena has it. <br /> Action Items (as outlined by Fran Anderson): <br /> 1. VLEACH working session first/Source Area Definition/Define Area I data <br /> gaps <br />