Laserfiche WebLink
• 0 <br /> Mr. Fernando . -3- 14 December 1995 <br /> 8. Page 4-3, Section 4.2.1, Area I Subsurface Soil <br /> The FS states that soil samples were collected at depths of one to 100 feet bgs with most samples <br /> collected within the upper 25 feet bgs. The FS should explain the rationale for the <br /> preponderance of samples at this interval. <br /> 9. Pages 4-3 and 4-6, Section 4.2.1.1, Potential Source Area 1 (S1) <br /> The FS states that S1 is characterized by borings MW-9, MW-19, SB-313, SB-2-95, SB-3-95, <br /> SB-4-95, and SB-23-95; boring logs show that concrete or wood barriers were encountered at <br /> depths of 15-23 feet bgs; PNAs were detected at significant levels at 24 feet bgs in MW-9 and at <br /> 19.5 feet bgs in SB-4-95; and chemical data are summarized in Table 4-1. <br /> The sampling program is inconsistent in sampling depths and types of analyses performed. <br /> Following are the sample locations and their sampling intervals: MW-9: 2.6-40.5 feet bgs; MW- <br /> 19: 50 and 100 feet bgs; SB-2-95 and SB-3B: 3-8 feet bgs; SB-3-95: 11.5-12 feet bgs; SB-4-95: <br /> 10.5-20 feet bgs; and SB-23-95: 7.5-24 feet bgs. At MW-9, soil samples were analyzed for total <br /> PNAs and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) at the first sampling depth of 2.6-3.0 <br /> feet bgs. At the next sampling depth of 3.0-3.5 feet bgs, the sample was tested for total volatile <br /> organic compounds (VOCs) and TPH as gasoline. This alternating sampling procedure was used <br /> throughout the sampling depth. <br /> As a result, the vertical extent of contamination has not been identified. For example, at 24.0- <br /> 24.5 feet bgs, total PNAs and TPHd were detected at 1,875 and 5,425 mg/kg, respectively. The <br /> next available data for total PNAs (1.28 mg/kg) and TPHd (9.68 mg/kg) were taken from the <br /> interval at 35.0-35.5 feet bgs . Thus, there are more than 10 feet of undefined soil layer beyond <br /> the point where the highest concentrations of total PNAs and TPHd were detected. If <br /> remediation is proposed to go down to about 35 feet bgs, at least in this particular spot, further <br /> characterization will not be necessary since remediation will address the interval which lacks <br /> data. MW-19 was not tested for total VOCs. SB-3B was not tested for TPHd/g. <br /> Table 4-1 lists `Total VOCs' as one of the column headings. The table should define `VOCs'. <br /> The term is typically associated with solvents such as carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, <br /> trichloroethylene, etc. If the table is referring to aromatic compounds associated with petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons, the term `BTEX' is more appropriate and should be used. <br /> The lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination in S I has not been defined except to the east <br /> of SB-23-95. To the west, MW-12 may define S1's lateral and vertical extent. However, I could <br /> not find the soil sample results for MW-12 in Appendix B which contains the soil data for the <br /> site. To the north is MW-9. As stated above, MW-9 is highly contaminated at about 25 feet, <br /> lacks data for 10 feet beyond this depth and is still contaminated at 35 feet. Lateral and vertical <br /> definition of this contamination to the north is necessary. To the south, SB-3B and SB-3-95 <br /> were sampled at maximum depths of only eight and 12 feet bgs, respectively. Laterally, the <br /> definition of the extent of contamination is acceptable. However, the data are limited to make a <br /> determination of the vertical extent. <br />