My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
1201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544188
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2019 2:45:23 PM
Creation date
2/27/2019 9:36:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544188
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0006698
FACILITY_NAME
FERNANDOS PLACE
STREET_NUMBER
1201
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
14716003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1201 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
taken from either of the soil borings. <br /> A monitoring well (MW 1 ) was constructed in the area of Tank #3 with a twenty-foot screen setting <br /> at a bottom depth of 50 feet. After well development and purging, water samples were extracted <br /> and analyzed for BTEX, TPHg and MTBE. Free product was found in MW l , and the water sample <br /> was contaminated with gasoline. <br /> On 6/15/98, a report of the findings was issued on Phase I ofthis site investigation and further site <br /> investigation work was recommended. In answer to the Phase 1 report, Mr. Michael Inf rma of the <br /> PHS-EHD requested that a Work Plan be formulated to assess the extent of the contamination <br /> plume. Mr. Huckins ordered that pre-approval be obtained from the UST Clean-up Fund and the <br /> Work Plan be constructed. A well permit was obtain from the PHS-EHD on 2/9/99, and the owner <br /> was notified construction would begin on 3/08/99. <br /> On 3/08/99 work was started on the bore hole for MW2A to a depth of 120 feet. The monitoring <br /> well was completed on 3/9/99. The bore hole for MW3A was started on 3/10/99 to a depth of 105 <br /> feet and the monitoring well was completed on 3/11 /1999. MW213 and MW.313 were installed on <br /> 3/ 12/99. <br /> INTERIM REPORT OF FINDINGS <br /> Soil Boring Procedure <br /> Onlythe bore holes for MW2A and MW3A were sampled and logged. Soil samples were extracted <br /> at five foot intervals on both borings. An eight inch hollow stem auger with a two-inch split spoon <br /> sampler was used for all soil samples. The depth of each soil boring was determined by visual and <br /> odor reference. Each boring was completed to the depth determined to be the vertical extent of the <br /> contamination plume. <br /> The soil borings for MW213 and MW313 were made to existing ground water plus ten feet. These <br /> bore holes were not sampled, as they were less than ten feet from the respective soil boring of <br /> MW2A and MW3A which were sampled to a greater depth. <br /> Soil Sample Analysis Results <br /> Soil samples from the soil boring of MW2A indicate that the contamination plume begins at <br /> twenty feet below the surface and continues to a depth of 120 feet. MW3A produced contaminated <br /> samples from a depth of thirty feet to a depth of 105 feet below the surface. The most concentrated <br /> contamination lies between thirty and sixty feet below the surface with both bore holes (see <br /> attached summary of soil sample results from all 44 soil samples). <br /> Monitoring Well Construction and Sampling <br /> The four monitoring wells were constructed in their respective soil borings as discussed above (see <br /> attached sketch for the construction of the monitoring wells) . Del-Tech Geotechnical developed <br /> each well to the standards of the industry. The monitoring wells were all sampled on 04/02/99. <br /> All wells produced samples that were contaminated by BTEX and TPHgas. All samples were <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.