Laserfiche WebLink
• 30 April 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 00-0769 <br />' Page 2 of 7 <br /> A Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to water in all the wells to the nearest <br />' 0 01-foot,relative to the tops of the well casings(Table 1) Between Sand 11 gallons of ground water <br /> (a minimum of three casing-water volumes per well) were evacuated (purged) from single-level <br />! wells MW-1,MW-2B,and MW-3B,and between 36 and 44 gallons were purged from deep, single- <br /> level wells MW-2A and MW-3A, utilizing disposable polyethylene bailers or a Waterra inertial <br /> pump equipped with 5/8-inch diameter polyethylene tubing and a check valve Multi-level <br />' monitoring wells MW-4 through MW-9 were purged utilizing the Waterra inertial pump equipped <br /> with 3/8-inch diameter polyethylene tubing and a check valve Approximately 0 12 to 5 5 gallons <br /> of ground water (a minimum of three casing-water volumes per well) were purged from the multi- <br /> level monitoring wells <br /> Temperature,pH,and conductivity were measured at regular purge-volume intervals from each well <br />' using an Oakton water analyzer Field logs are provided in Appendix B Purged water was <br /> temporarily stored on-site in properly labeled, Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved <br /> 55-gallon drums pending proper disposal <br /> 1 <br /> 2 2 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from wells MW-2B and MW-3B utilizing new, 2-inch <br />' diameter disposable polyethylene bailers Samples were collected from wells MW-1, MW-2A, <br /> MW-3B, and MW-4A through MW-9D utilizing a Waterra inertia pump and 3/8-inch diameter <br /> polyethylene tubing The samples were transferred into three, 40-milliliter EPA-approved volatile <br />' <br /> organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid solution as a preservative <br /> Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and ' <br /> capping The sample vials were labeled with the monitoring well designation,date,time of sampling, <br />' and the sampler's initials Following collection, samples were placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory, for analysis Samples were <br /> analyzed for the following constituents <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br />' Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> * Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) and the fuel additives methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE); ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> r tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME),tertiary-butyl alcohol(TBA), 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB), <br /> 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), ethanol, and methanol in accordance with EPA Method <br />' 8260B <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> 1 <br />