Laserfiche WebLink
>Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 8:09 AM <br /> >To: Cesar Ruvalcaba [EH] <cruvalcaba@sjcehd.com> <br /> >Subject: FW: SP-001 Certified Inspector Inspection Reports <br /> > Please see email below. <br /> > Dana Schmidt, P.E. <br /> >Standards Engineer <br /> >STI/SPFA <br /> >944 Donata Court <br /> > Lake Zurich, IL 60047 <br /> > Direct Phone: (847) 550-3832 <br /> >-----Original Message----- <br /> * From: Garrison Reeves<greeves455@aol.com> <br /> >Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 10:08 AM <br /> >To: Dana Schmidt<dschmidt@steeltank.com> <br /> >Subject: Re: SP-001 Certified Inspector Inspection Reports <br /> >Thanks, and Mr. Ruvalcaba needs to understand that he has permits and is charging fees for non-certified tanks.This <br /> causes more harm than anything because the entity thinks that everything is good as long as he pays his fees. <br /> >>On Mar 6, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Dana Schmidt<dschmidt@steeltank.com>wrote: <br /> >>Ok. Mr. Ruvalcaba was looking for a formal 20 year report and it sounds like you were not asked to do this. <br /> >> Putting your recommendations in writing is important and would have saved the confusion in this case. Written <br /> reports should follow the requirements in Section 7 and 8 of SP001. <br /> >> I will pass this on to Mr. Ruvalcaba. <br /> >> Dana Schmidt, P.E. <br /> >>Standards Engineer <br /> >>STI/SPFA <br /> >>944 Donata Court <br /> >> Lake Zurich, IL 60047 <br /> >> Direct Phone: (847) 550-3832 <br /> >>-----Original Message----- <br /> » From: Garrison Reeves<greeves455@aol.com> <br /> >>Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 9:57 AM <br /> >>To: Dana Schmidt<dschmidt@steeltank.com> <br /> >>Subject: Re: SP-001 Certified Inspector Inspection Reports <br /> >> No. I told their Environmental manager and he spoke to Mr. Ruvalcaba about the tanks not being certified tanks.The <br /> STI reports have "unknown" mark as to the specifications of the tanks. I followed the AST inspection report <br /> requirements from the STI inspection page on the STI web page and as far as I know this was not a 20 year formal <br /> inspection as no inspections had ever been done. <br /> >>Thanks, Gary Reeves <br /> 3 <br />