Laserfiche WebLink
Former ARCO Station N10168 <br /> 441 W. Charter Way <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> vertically to the vadose zone for SVE recovery. URS selected the depth in <br /> response to SJC/EHD's previously expressed concern with sparging into the sand <br /> interval between 40 and 45 feet below surface grade (bsg). URS plans to test IAS <br /> feasibility with the whole system installed. SJC/EHD noted to URS on 20 June <br /> 2005 that the State Water Board Cleanup Fund (CUF) may balk at reimbursing for <br /> installation and operation of a complete remedial system (21 IAS sparge and SVE <br /> points) that was not shown to be effective for the site through a pilot test. URS <br /> stated it is USR's belief that ARCO was willing to assume the risks for installation <br /> of the complete system would not expect reimbursement from the CUF if it is <br /> ineffective. URS further stated during the 20 June 2005 conversation that this <br /> willingness would be put in writing. If this is so, SJC/EHD can approve installation <br /> of the IAS system. <br /> URS has proposed to construct the nested SVE and IAS wells by setting the IAS <br /> well screen from 36 to 38 feet bsg with filter pack sand from 33 to 38.5 feet bsg; a <br /> 2-foot bentonite seal from 31 to 33 feet bsg and cement grout from 27 to 31 feet <br /> bsg. The SVE well would then be installed over the grout. You may install the wells <br /> with this design, but the State of California requires that cement grouts be <br /> undisturbed for a minimum of 12 hours following emplacement, which may be <br /> cumbersome for installing 21 such wells. You may want to consider using <br /> bentonite grout for the whole interval between 27 and 34 feet bsg. The depth to <br /> groundwater near MW-1 has generally been less than 30 feet, although it has <br /> been as deep as 37 feet, so it seems likely that the lower portion of the seal should <br /> always be hydrated and uncompromised. URS agreed with this construction <br /> during a telephone conversation on 22 June 2005. <br /> SJC/EHD inquired of URS on the intended use or destruction of the existing vapor <br /> extraction wells on the site. URS responded that the existing vapor wells would be <br /> plumbed into the SVE system and utilized in accordance with their ability to extract <br /> contaminants and that sufficient access to all wells on the site would be <br /> maintained for proper well destruction at the conclusion of their usefulness. <br /> SJC/EHD is also concerned with the remedial needs of impacted groundwater in <br /> the sand unit directly underlying the silt unit targeted for IAS. URS plans to monitor <br /> the sand interval for a sufficient response to the SVE/IAS operation. URS assured <br /> SJC/EHD on 20 June 2005, that if the impacted groundwater in the sand unit does <br /> not exhibit a sufficient response to the SVE/IAS operation that they have room and <br /> the willingness to install a remediation system to address that groundwater. <br /> The proposed locations for the three new monitoring wells appear to be <br /> reasonable. The completion depth of the proposed wells is 30 feet bsg, which will <br /> keep the screen intervals in the silt and sandy silt interval. SJC/EHD expressed <br /> interest for monitoring the sand interval approximately 40 to 45 feet bsg if present <br /> in the area. URS agreed by telephone on 21 June 2005 to dual complete the wells <br /> with separate screen intervals to address both intervals of interest. SJC/EHD <br />