Laserfiche WebLink
The elevated reporting limits were the result of dilutions performed by the laboratory in order to quantitate a target analyte(s); <br />{ ❑ The elevated reporting limits reported in the Method analysis of samples <br /> were due to presence of in these samples. <br /> k ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> have been confirmed as gasoline/diesel. <br />�i ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> is/are due to chromatographic <br /> a hic <br /> f <br /> peaks present in the gasoline quantitation range,however,the peaks present do not resemble the pattern for gasoline. <br /> ❑ The reported results for GRO/DRO in samples <br /> is/are due to a discrete peak(s) in the quantitation range (probably <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples <br /> should <br /> be considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. <br /> )5f The reported results for e-4-hg no in samples <br /> L W-C p" ?C� may <br /> be biase `Co !high because the associated continuing calibration standard was outside of acceptance criteria. <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples <br /> may be biased low since the analyses <br /> for these analytes were perforated days beyond the U.S. EPA recommended Bolding time of days. <br /> f <br /> 'rt ❑ The reported results for in samples <br /> l may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. <br /> r o The reported results for in samples <br /> may be biased low/high as demonstrated by a low/high surrogate recovery due to matrix interference. <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples should <br /> f be considered estimated due to a high relative percent difference reported between the associated LCS and LCSD. <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples may <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples may <br /> be biased low/high due to a low/high average percent recovery reported in the associated MS/MSD analysis. <br /> a The reported results for <br /> in samples should <br /> be considered estimated because the primary and confirmation column results differed by greater than 40% RPD. <br /> ❑ The reported results for in samples should be <br /> considered estimated; the samples were initially analyzed within holding time but required dilution. The dilution was <br /> j performed out of holding time. <br />