My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
441
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2019 6:15:48 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 4:44:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012861
RECORD_ID
PR0544208
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0003628
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #2168*
STREET_NUMBER
441
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707607
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
441 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> BP/ARCO <br /> F3P/ARCO Site Number: 2�(PO <br /> Reviewer: L m Sample Collection Date(s): <br /> Senior Reviewer: <br /> 1 Data Review Checklist for Methods <br /> Item Yes No NIA <br /> Notes <br /> 1. Do the dates sampled and sample IDs agree with COC? <br /> 2. Were the samples received in the appropriate condition? <br /> Is this documented?(QAPP Table 4-1) <br /> 3. Are all report forms present for samples listed on COC? <br /> 4. Is the case narrative present and complete? <br /> 5. Do the analytes reported agree with the analyte list <br /> requested on the COC? <br /> 6. Do the reporting limits(RLs)meet the specifications of <br /> the QAPP?(QAPP Table 7-1) v <br /> 7. Are the RLs adjusted for dilutions/sample size/percent <br /> moisture,if applicable? <br /> 8. Have the holding times been met?(QAPP Table 4-1) <br /> 9. Are the reporting units correct and consistent? <br /> (QAPP Table 7-1) ✓ <br /> 10. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one <br /> method blank/preparation batch? <br /> 11. Are the method blank results below RLs? <br /> If no,qualify data with 5-and 10-Times rule. <br /> 5 <br /> 12, Were the samples spiked with surrogates? <br /> 13. Were the laboratory surrogate recovery criteria met for <br /> each sample? (See attached.) <br /> F14. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one set of <br /> MS/MSDs/preparation batch? <br /> -'"15. Were the laboratory MS/MSD criteria met? NP S <br /> (See attached.) <br /> 16. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one f <br /> LCS/preparation batch? <br /> . 17. Were the laboratory LCS/LCSD criteria met? <br /> (See attached.) ✓' <br /> 18. Did the laboratory prepare and analyze at least one lab <br /> t.F'lZ I <br /> duplicate/preparation batch(if no MSD/LCSD)? <br /> R <br /> 19. Were the lab duplicate RPD criteria met?(See attached.) ✓ M <br /> F-20. Were equipment blanks collected? <br /> 2l. Are the equipment blank results below RLs? <br /> 4 If no,qualify data with 5-and I 0-Times rule. <br /> -22. Were field duplicates collected? <br /> �23. Were field duplicate RPD criteria met? j <br /> (QAPP Table 6-1) f <br /> i <br /> k 24 Based on the data provided, are there any additional QC <br /> �V <br /> Cly <br /> 25. Do the data tables match the hardcopy report? <br /> t .:1BP-ARCOIChemistry-Data ManagementlChemistrylChecklists and TemplateslDQI Checklist Generic-Air,Aqueous, Soil-Rev.2.doc <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.