My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001482
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
440
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536618
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 11:54:34 AM
Creation date
3/4/2019 10:15:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001482
RECORD_ID
PR0536618
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021026
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON CHARTER WAY COMMON PLUME
STREET_NUMBER
440
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
440 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> 440 West Charter Way, Stockton, California September 16, 1992 <br /> Texaco Environmental Services Page 2 <br /> blower Results from the pilot test indicate a conservative radius of influence of 25 feet Air <br /> samples collected from MW-4 and MW-5 contained total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline <br /> (TPH-G) of 71,000 micrograms per liter (,ug/l) and 150,000 Vgll, respectively Because the <br /> MW's are cross-screened through the upper clays and lower silts and sands, soil vapors may <br /> have been preferentially drawn from the capillary fringe in the lower sands Therefore, the <br /> results of the pilot test may not be representative of the conditions in the upper clay soil <br /> horizon where the majority of the adsorbed hydrocarbons exist <br /> 3 0 WORK PERFORMED <br /> 3 1 Vapor Extraction Well Installation <br /> On April 27 and 28, 1992, a Groundwater Technology field geologist supervised the drilling of <br /> four 12-inch diameter soil borings (VE-1, VE-2, VE-3 and VE-4), to a depth of forty feet These <br /> borings are located in the northeastern part of the site in the area defined as being impacted <br /> with petroleum hydrocarbons (Figure 1) The spacing between borings was determined by <br /> assuming that each vapor extraction well would achieve a minimum 20 foot radius of influence <br /> in the clay strata as indicated during the vapor extraction pilot test performed on the MW's All <br /> boring locations for vapor extraction well (VE) installation were selected to ensure that the area <br /> of impacted soil would be influenced by the applied vacuum during vapor extraction <br /> During drilling operations a field geologist continuously logged the soils encountered in <br /> accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System Sod samples were collected at five foot <br /> intervals during drilling using a 2-inch inside diameter (I D ) California split spoon sampler A <br /> portable phototonization detector (PID) was used to field screen samples for the presence of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons No soil samples were submitted for laboratory analyses since the <br /> borings were drilled near the areas explored during the assessment phase of this project <br /> Two vapor extraction wells were nested in each boring, with the screened intervals positioned <br /> at approximate depths of 15 to 25 feet BGS (VE-1 A, VE-2A, VE-3A and VE-4A), and 30 to 40 <br /> feet BGS (VE-1 B, VE-2B, VE-3B and VE-4B) This design was chosen based on the site <br /> stratigraphy determined earlier, and to allow concentrations of vacuum pressure on specific <br /> impacted horizons The wells were designed to make the extraction system efficient <br /> i1115k GROUNDWATER <br /> r-- <br /> �'�L TECHNOLOGY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.