Laserfiche WebLink
440 West Charter Way, Stockton, California September 16, 1992 <br /> • Texaco Environmental Services Page 3 <br /> throughout the life of the project Each extraction point consists of 4-inch diameter, 0 020- <br /> inch slot PVC well screen and blank PVC well casing A sand pack was placed around the <br /> screen and one to two feet above each section of screen using a number 2/12 Monterey sand <br /> or equivalent Each extraction point was sealed within the boring by placing a foot thick <br /> bentonite seal above the sand pack Construction details of the VE's are presented on the drill <br /> logs in Appendix A <br /> 3 2 Sod Vapor Extraction Pilot Test <br /> A sod vapor extraction (sod-vent) pilot test using the newly installed vapor extraction wells, <br /> was conducted on June 24, 1992 Permission was obtained from the San Joaquin County Air <br /> Pollution Control District prior to conducting the test The test was conducted to determine the <br /> radius of influence and the concentration of hydrocarbons in the soil vapor extracted from the <br /> VE's Vapors were drawn from each extraction well by a 1 5-hp regenerative blower Flow <br /> rate during the test was monitored with a Kurz model 441 air velocity meter, and was varied <br /> between 22 and 38 cubic feet per minute (cfm) Effluent from the blower was routed through <br /> a series of two 55-gallon drums of vapor phase granular activated carbon (GAC) Vapor <br /> emissions were controlled using GAC and the effluent air flow was monitored periodically <br /> throughout the test to ensure that hydrocarbons were being removed from the air flow prior to <br /> discharge During the test a sample from each extraction well was collected in a Tedlar bag <br /> and shipped with a chain-of-custody manifest to a Texaco approved laboratory for analysis for <br /> BTEX and TPH-G according to EPA methods 5030/8015/8020 <br /> 4.0 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST RESULTS <br /> The results of vacuum measurements taken during the soil vent pilot test are recorded in Table <br /> 1 , Both level A and level B wells required high vacuums ranging between 50 and 56 inches of <br /> water Within each individual extraction well the radii of influence generated in the A and B <br /> levels were similar However, the radii of influence determined for each nested well location <br /> varied from well to well Extraction well clusters located on the eastern side of the property <br /> (VE-3 and 4), recorded a greater air flow rate and induced a greater vacuum in observation <br /> wells; than those located adjacent to the Food Mart budding (VE-1 and 2) Vapor extraction <br /> 1701JI GROUNDWATER <br /> I'111--11 TECHNOLOGY <br />