My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001488
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
440
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536618
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 11:55:49 AM
Creation date
3/4/2019 10:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001488
RECORD_ID
PR0536618
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0021026
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON CHARTER WAY COMMON PLUME
STREET_NUMBER
440
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
440 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> CAMBRIA <br /> April 17, 2000 PHSIEHD Letter Response <br /> Plume Definition PHSIEHD states in Paragraph 1 of their letter that "the plume is <br /> undefined" at this site As previously discussed in our August 26, 1999 work plan the plume <br /> is fairly well defined, "The extent of hydrocarbons in groundwater is defined by wells MW-7, <br /> MW-13, MW-14, MW-16 and MW-17 " Wells MW-6 and MW-8 also help delineate lateral <br /> the extent of the plume All seven of these wells have consistently shown low to non- <br /> detectable levels of hydrocarbons, which shows plume definition west, southwest, south, <br /> southeast, and east of the site As we stated in our work plan "The primary area where the <br /> distribution of hydrocarbons in groundwater has not been completed is in the direction of <br /> well MW-15 The hydrocarbon plume appears to be stable and, if the hydrocarbon <br /> concentration decreases are due to natural attenuation, the plume is shrinking " If the <br /> hydrocarbon plume is stable or shrinking, then additional delineation of the hydrocarbon is <br /> not warranted Quarterly chemical analytical data from wells at this site show declining <br /> concentrations which suggest the plume is shrinking <br /> We agree that the vertical extent of hydrocarbons and gasoline oxygenates in groundwater <br /> has not been delineated at this site This is why our original work plan proposed a deep soil <br /> boring be drilled in the primary source area to log the soil and to collect soil and groundwater <br /> samples for chemical analyses We typically propose one soil boring of this type located in <br /> the source area to determine if gasoline constituents have migrated vertically beneath the <br /> source area This addresses one of two general scenarios for vertical migration of <br /> contaminants The other general vertical migration scenario is where the plume migrates <br /> vertically while it migrates horizontally downgradient (a plunging plume) A soil boring <br /> drilled in the source area may not be able to detect a plunging plume A second deep soil <br /> boring should be drilled downgradient of the source area to determine if the plume is migrating <br /> vertically We propose such a boring for this site later in this document if chemical <br /> analytical data from these borings indicate vertical migration in groundwater has not <br /> occurred, then investigation efforts can be focussed on the shallow groundwater plume If <br /> data show vertical migration in groundwater has occurred then it may become necessary to <br /> install deeper groundwater monitoring wells to monitor and delineate the extent of the deeper <br /> plume <br /> Work Plan Directive PHS/EHD's April 17, 2000 letter states in Paragraph 2 "On May 26, <br /> 1999 PHS/EHD issued a written directive including the following site-specific requirements " <br /> This statement is not consistent with the May 26, 1999 letter The May 26, 1999 <br /> PHSIEHD letter states in Paragraph 2 "The responsible party is now directed to submit a <br /> workplan to PHS/EHD considering the following comments " Cambria/Equiva complied with <br /> 1399 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.