Laserfiche WebLink
C A M B R I A <br /> i <br /> the directive to submit a work plan This work plan was issued August 26, 1999 In <br /> preparing this work plan Cambria considered the comments mentioned in PHS/EHD's May <br /> 26, 1999 letter The comments we were asked to consider were not presented in the May 26, <br /> 1999 PHS/EHD letter as "site-specific requirements " <br /> Cambria considered preparing flow nets, fence diagrams, and rose diagrams for this site, as <br /> requested by PHSIBHD We felt flow nets and fence diagrams were not warranted for this site <br /> but did propose to prepare a rose diagram and to update cross-sections in our August 26, 1999 <br /> work plan We did not include rose diagrams in our quarterly monitoring reports submitted <br /> after our work plan because the work plan had not been approved by PHS/EHD The May <br /> 26, 1999 PHS/EHD letter stated in Paragraph 2 "The workplan must he approved and <br /> implemented within 90 calendar days from the date of this letter " This statement indicates <br /> we need to get PHS/EHD approval of our work plan prior to implementing it This <br /> statement also suggests that we would get approval or review of our work plan from <br /> PHS/EHD within 90 days of PHSIEHD's May 26, 1999 letter Since we did not receive <br /> approval or comments on our work plan until April 17, 2000 we have not performed tasks <br /> proposed in our work plan <br /> • Additional Soil Borings PHS/EHD recommends in the April 17, 2000 letter that at least four <br /> continuously cored soil borings be drilled in two different locations "PHS/EHD now <br /> recommends the installation of at least four continuous core boreholes given the strength of <br /> the plume documented near MW-11 Two horeholes should he placed near SB-3/VW-4, and <br /> Iwo off-site near AfW-11 " We do not see a need to continuously core two borings adjacent <br /> to each other at two different locations Perhaps PHS/EHD was just recognizing that when <br /> drilling with Cone Penetrometer Testing (CPT) equipment, multiple boreholes are needed at <br /> each drilling location to log the soil and to collect soil and groundwater samples Different <br /> tool heads need to be put on the tip of the CPT rods for different operations There is a tool <br /> for logging the soil, there is a different tool for collecting soil samples, and there is yet a <br /> different tool for collecting groundwater samples <br /> Typically we first drill with the CPT soil logging tool to log the soil types beneath the site <br /> Then a second boring is drilled adjacent to the first with the soil sampling tool affixed to the <br /> CPT rods to allow collection of soil samples Then a third boring is drilled adjacent to the <br /> first two with the groundwater sampling tool to collect groundwater samples <br /> Our work plan addendum, presented below, proposes two soil boring locations in agreement <br /> with the recommendation of PHS/EHD More details on these borings are provided below <br /> 1399 3 <br />