ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001182 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr Don Rodgers Project 2613-100 03 December 3, 1998 Page 2 Between September 17 and October 11, 1996, EMCON observed the drilling of six soil borings (B-1R through B-6R) One soil boring was converted to monitoring well MW-1R, three soil borings were converted to dual completion vapor extraction wells VW-1 through VW-3, and one soli boring was converted to a single vapor extraction well VW-4 (EMCON, Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation Report, February 5, 1997) The results of this investigation indicated the following • With the exception of soil samples collected from boring B-6R, residual hydrocarbons were detected in each boring The highest concentrations were detected approximately 10 feet below ground surface (bgs) near the former USTs Total oil and grease was detected in the soil sample collected near the former UST cavity (located near the building) at a concentration of 10,000 parts per million Polychlorinated bi-phenyls, TPHD, and chlorinated hydrocarbons were below laboratory detection limits in all soil samples analyzed from soil borings B-2R and B-6R TPHG, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene (BTEX) isomers, and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) were detected in the groundwater sample collected from . monitoring well MW-1R TPHG and benzene were detected at concentrations of 33,000 parts per billion (ppb) and 1,400 ppb, respectively MTBE was detected at a concentration of 550 ppb GROUNDWATER MONITORING: THIRD QUARTER 1998 On August 12, 1998, a Pinnacle technician was on site to measure depth to groundwater and collect a groundwater sample from well MW-1R for subjective and laboratory analyses Floating product was not observed in groundwater monitoring well MW-1R (see Table 1 and Appendix A) Pinnacle used these data to evaluate changes in concentrations of dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons in the groundwater Pinnacle's sampling and analysis procedures are presented in Appendix B A groundwater sample was collected from monitoring well MW-1R and was analyzed at Sequoia Analytical in Sacramento, California The groundwater sample was analyzed for TPHG using U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Modified Methods 8015, and for BTEX and MTBE using USEPA Method 8020 In addition, per the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, requirements, the groundwater sample was analyzed for the oxygenates tertiary butanol, MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary butanol ether (ETBE), and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME) using USEPA Method 8260 Copies of the chain-of-custody records and laboratory analysis reports are presented in Appendix C • The results of laboratory analyses indicated that dissolved hydrocarbons were present in the monitoring well TPHG and benzene were detected at concentrations of 3230 ppb and 453 ppb, SAC1D 1QMRIR0DGERSI3RDQ981RDGRQ398 DOC-98Usg i P"M444 Rev 0,1213198